On Sat, Sep 13, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> Are there more Informations about other fields in the .spec:
> [...]
I'm planning to collect all essential information for a OpenPKG .spec
file developer. Once it is available I'll post it here.
> - Is there a defined set of values for "Group" and "License" ?
No, unfortunately until now we've no fixed set of values for those.
> - Distribution can be CORE, BASE, PLUS, EVAL and JUNK, i think.
Exactly, and for internal use there is also "PRIV" (private) reserved.
> - What criterias does one have to use to decide what version of OpenPKG
> is required (openpkg >= 20020206, or what) ?
For this there is the HISTORY document in the "openpkg" package
source tree. It lists all releases of "openpkg" together with a small
description what happended. We use this as our reference for "openpkg"
dependencies.
> And what about documenting the package options under the %description part ?
Hmmm... do they really need documentation? I mean, they can be listed
with "rpm -qpi" (for source and binary RPMs), or "rpm -qi" (for
installed packages) and unless there names are not too crazy I have
though they are more or less clear. But perhaps you're right and this
is only clear to me ;_) and not clear too the all. How should this
documentation look like?
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
