On Fri, Apr 04, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003, Michael Schloh wrote: >> Explicitly state providing DNS and conflicting bind[8] > >Why do they conflict? Sure, both provide DNS, but a Conflicts: header >should be IMHO only applied if _FILES_ of two packages conflict. Not if >the purpose of the package conflicts. Same for teapop IMHO! > Like I said, I'm happy to change the policy if you want to redefine the purpose of our 'Provides' and 'Conflicts' fields. So I assume your vote is to ignore the 'Provides' field, and mark conflicts only to packages with conflicting files. That would be two and a half votes then.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Development Team, Application Services Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
