On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:59:25AM +0200, Thomas Lotterer wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 07:56:54PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > [...] > > > > - What criterias does one have to use to decide what version of OpenPKG > > > > is required (openpkg >= 20020206, or what) ? > > > > > > For this there is the HISTORY document in the "openpkg" package > > > source tree. It lists all releases of "openpkg" together with a small > > > description what happended. We use this as our reference for "openpkg" > > > dependencies. > > > > Cough. ... Cough. ... May i step in, here ? I do not depend on it, but > > could you find a better place to flag contributions than just the CVS log ? > > > A separate document will become a maintenance nightmare and > is very likely to become out of sync quickly. But wait -
Yes, you're right. > good news. We also have a neat web page that lists it. See > http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile?f=openpkg-src/openpkg/HISTORY :-) > Additional information can be found using the timeline feature, see > http://cvs.openpkg.org/timeline?x=1&c=2&dm=1&px=openpkg-src/openpkg That is a nice feature. I was about to recommend a ChangeLog in addition to HISTORY... > This version check should be easy for a RELEASE. For CURRENT, i agree, > it is a more complex task to find out the ultimate version. There is a > pragmatic approach to this. Just take the openpkg version you used when > you created the package. ... I will look into it. (mk) -- Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47 >> Im pr�motorischen Cortex kann jeder ein Held sein. (bdw) << ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
