Request 274 was acted upon.
_________________________________________________________________________
URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/274
Ticket: [OpenPKG #274]
Subject: [bootstrap] 'openpkg' missing from RPM database
Requestors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Queue: openpkg
Owner: Nobody
Status: open
Transaction: Correspondence added by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Time: Fri Oct 10 16:10:55 2003
________________________________________________________________________
Yes, I checked the free space available. The happened across several
different machines. The one common denominator was the Opteron
architecture.
As an aside, I sidestepped this problem by doing '--nodeps' RPM
operations just to see how compatible the x86_64 CPU was with the
OpenPKG infrastructure. It looks like several packages can't handle the
x86_64 architecture now.
Among those that I've tried to far, m4 has the most explicit failure.
Its config.sub script (generated by Automake) doesn't know about x86_64
and dies loudly. Unfortunately, the m4 people haven't updated their
Makefile.am to handle newer versions of Automake, so one can't just run
'aclocal ; automake' to fix this.
--Matt
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 08:36, Ralf S. Engelschall via RT wrote:
> Request 274 was acted upon.
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
> URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/274
> Ticket: [OpenPKG #274]
> Subject: [bootstrap] 'openpkg' missing from RPM database
> Requestors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Queue: openpkg
> Owner: Nobody
> Status: open
> Transaction: Correspondence added by rse
> Time: Fri Oct 10 15:36:37 2003
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
>
> > The current bootstrap package often doesn't add entries into the RPM
> > database for either 'openpkg' or 'OpenPKG' when doing a fresh install.
> >
> > I compiled this and got the same results on several platforms:
> >
> > - x86_64-suse8
> > - x86_64-redhat8.0.95
> >
> > > host# sh /tmp/openpkg-20031008-20031008.x86_64-redhat8.0.95-cw.sh
> > > ... [ normal installation messages ] ...
> > > host# /cw/bin/rpm -qa
> > > gpg-pubkey-63c4cb9f-3c591eda
>
> Hmmm... strange. I cannot reproduce this on our SuSE 8.2 box:
>
> | bash-2.05b# sh openpkg-20031008-20031008.src.sh --prefix=/xx --user=xx --group=xx
> | [...]
> | + rm -rf /ltmp/openpkg-20031008-root
> | + rm -rf /ltmp/openpkg-20031008
> | + rm -f /ltmp/rpm /ltmp/rpm.1 /ltmp/rpm.2 /ltmp/rpm.3 /ltmp/.popt /ltmp/rpm.pre
> | + rm -f /ltmp/openpkg.boot.prolog.sh
> | + set +x
> | ++ resulting files (placed into ..):
> | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5959485 Oct 10 13:31
> openpkg-20031008-20031008.ix86-suse8.2-xx.rpm
> | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26019236 Oct 10 13:31
> openpkg-20031008-20031008.ix86-suse8.2-xx.sh
> | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16249379 Oct 10 13:31
> openpkg-20031008-20031008.src.rpm
> | openpkg-20031008-20031008.src.sh: building done.
> | openpkg-20031008-20031008.src.sh: cleaning up...
> | openpkg-20031008-20031008.src.sh: cleaned up.
> | bash-2.05b# sh openpkg-20031008-20031008.ix86-suse8.2-xx.sh
> | openpkg-20031008-20031008.ix86-suse8.2-xx.sh: installing into /xx...
> | openpkg-20031008-20031008.ix86-suse8.2-xx.sh: installation done.
> | bash-2.05b# /xx/bin/rpm -qa
> | openpkg-20031008-20031008
> | gpg-pubkey-63c4cb9f-3c591eda
> | bash-2.05b#
>
> So, I think it has to be a local problem. Are you sure /tmp or $TMPDIR
> has at least 150MB of free disk space? Because perhaps our build run out
> of disk-space and hence some operations failed silently.
>
> Ralf S. Engelschall
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.engelschall.com
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
> Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
