OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
____________________________________________________________________________
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Thomas Lotterer
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re Date: 11-Feb-2004 09:51:08
Branch: HEAD Handle: 2004021108510700
Modified files:
openpkg-re todo.txt
Log:
clear last MUST HAVE entry; add/update details/items; shift priorites
Summary:
Revision Changes Path
1.180 +21 -18 openpkg-re/todo.txt
____________________________________________________________________________
patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
Index: openpkg-re/todo.txt
============================================================================
$ cvs diff -u -r1.179 -r1.180 todo.txt
--- openpkg-re/todo.txt 10 Feb 2004 16:21:58 -0000 1.179
+++ openpkg-re/todo.txt 11 Feb 2004 08:51:07 -0000 1.180
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
o Sep-2003: Upgrade RPM 4.0.2 to 4.2.1
FUTURE:
- o Feb-2004: OpenPKG 2.0
+ o 25-Feb-2004: OpenPKG 2.0
o Jun-2004: OpenPKG 2.1
o Nov-2004: OpenPKG 2.2
o Feb-2005: OpenPKG 2.3
@@ -32,34 +32,34 @@
OpenPKG 1.3 Updates
- MFC: shiela
- MFC: cvstraq
+ - UPD: perl-openpkg compatiblity to support 1.x and 2.x (provides and uses both
sh and perl variant)
OpenPKG 2.0 Release Engineering
-------------------------------
MUST HAVE
- o fix all CORE and BASE packages
+ <done>
SHOULD HAVE:
- o use UUID for COOKIE header
- o fix all PLUS packages that existed in OpenPKG 1.3; downgrade to EVAL/JUNK as
a last resort [ms]
+ o fix all PLUS packages that existed in OpenPKG 1.3; downgrade to EVAL/JUNK as
a last resort
+ o fix all PLUS packages or downgrade to EVAL/JUNK
o Version: %{release} deploy: problems! -> openpkg build! Release: %{version}
XX, Version: %(rpm -q --qf '%release' *.spec)) [thl]
- o rse: simplify options (for tools, etc):
- - solution 1: remove all non-binary %options by replacing them
- with run-time decisions (config files, wrapper, etc.)
- - solution 2: %option with_xxx binary, %option [use_]xxx arbitrary string
- - solution 3: %option with_xxx binary, %variable xxx arbitrary string
- rse: check error code of tar in bootstrap script
- rse: Problem bootstrapping to a symlink pointing to nonexisting directory
- - thl: sgml auf xmlcatmgr umstellen! (3 dependent packages: docbook,
openjade/opensp, ?)
- dig into problem where file conflicts are not detected
- dig into problem where + in package name allows multiple installations of
same package
o companion release GNU shtool 2.0.0 [rse] thl: sh.* docs done
+ o companion release OSSP uuid 1.0.0 (with support for DCE API added) [rse]
+ o speclint.pl to check %build for BUILDROOT removal (now possible as new
perl-openpkg removed exceptions)
NICE TO HAVE:
- - ms: "OpenPKG" package branding with %{l_openpkg_release}
- - thl: basic set of meta-xxx packages
- o fix all PLUS packages or downgrade to EVAL/JUNK [ms]
- o fix EVAL/JUNK packages and elevate to PLUS [ms]
+ o rse: simplify options (for tools, etc):
+ - solution 1: remove all non-binary %options by replacing them
+ with run-time decisions (config files, wrapper, etc.)
+ - solution 2: %option with_xxx binary, %option [use_]xxx arbitrary string
+ - solution 3: %option with_xxx binary, %variable xxx arbitrary string
+ o use UUID for COOKIE header
+ - "OpenPKG" package branding with %{l_openpkg_release}
- rse: OpenPKG instance management audit log: added/removed/upgraded packages
- rse: RPM extension: fetch/curl replacement (OSSP fetch)
- thl: news.txt replaced by news.cgi which uses pre-scanned information
@@ -75,8 +75,12 @@
create users? This is needed to decide whether or not the users
must be erased on uninstall.
- popt cosmetics: shows --tag=XXX but expects --tag XXX (equal vs. space)
+ - fix petidomo and resurrect rt.openpkg.org bug database
+ - basic set of meta-xxx packages (concept not fully clear and using CURRENT
doesn't hurt at all)
+ - change sgml to use xmlcatmgr (>=3 dependent packages: docbook,
openjade/opensp, ...)
- cvstraq bug:
http://cvs.openpkg.org/timeline?x=1&c=2&dm=1&px=openpkg-src/apache shows
both apache and apache2 timeline
+ o perl-openpkg vs. perl-XXX .packlist removal
KNOWN ISSUES
@@ -198,10 +202,9 @@
# mv /usr/sbin/install-info /usr/sbin/install-info.debian
# ln -s /bin/true /usr/sbin/install-info
- REJECTED SCOPE CREEP (but needs to be discussed post release)
+ o more accurate version.release requirements
- o decide whether *-2.0.0.(src.)rpm should require: openpkg-2.0.0-2.0.0 or not
and why (not)
- o more accurate version.release requirements (Christoph supported by Thomas)
+ - decide whether *-2.0.0.(src.)rpm should require: openpkg-2.0.0-2.0.0 or not
and why (not)
currently all release packages require other packages unversioned,
i.e. the relationship of application A requiing library L is
@@ -236,7 +239,7 @@
macro did only get information from the last requirement entry
not all entries and conditional entries seem to be a even harder
challenge. So we stick to what we had in the past and this is
- deferred due to time constraints.
+ deferred due to time constraints. REJECTED SCOPE CREEP
OpenPKG 2.1 Development
-----------------------
@@ .
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
CVS Repository Commit List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
