On Sat, Mar 06, 2004, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2004, Matthias Kurz wrote: > > > I think it is not a good idea that amanda forces the install of xinetd. > > What is the alternative you suggest?
Hmmm, this question baffles me. Where is the problem with the native inetd e.g. under Solaris ? Or can the native inetd and xinetd coexist as long as there are no duplicate entries in their config files ? I never wanted to replace the native inetd, so i never tried it. And i can not try it currently, because there the make aborts (under Solaris 8/x86) with ld: fatal: file ../libs/lib/libportable.a: unknown file type ld: fatal: library -lportable: not found ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to xinetd collect2: ld returned 1 exit status /opkg/home/bin/gcc -O2 -pipe -I../libs/include ./itox.c -o itox -L../libs/lib -lsio -lmisc -lxlog -lportable -lstr -lpset -lm -lkstat -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl ld: fatal: file ../libs/lib/libportable.a: unknown file type ld: fatal: library -lportable: not found ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to itox collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [itox] Error 1 make: *** [makeprog] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /projects/tmp/opkg/rpm-tmp.1098 (%build) and i have no time to look into it. Perhaps this evening... (mk) -- Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47 >> Im pr�motorischen Cortex kann jeder ein Held sein. (bdw) << ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
