On Wed, Jan 12, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005, Michael Schloh wrote: >> new package: libodbcplus 0.2.3 (Unix ODBC C++ Abstraction Library) > > If the vendor names it libodbcxx himself why is it libodbcplus for us? > AFAIK we already used "xx" for "++" in other packages, too. > No, the vendor does not name it libodbcxx. It would be correct (according to the vendor's wishes) to name it libodbc++. Because that conflicts with our self made naming rules, I chose the one you see. There's no disadvantage in changing it to libodbcxx if you prefer that, however. Let me know what you decide.
-- Michael Schloh von Bennewitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Development Team, Operations Northern Europe Cable & Wireless Telecommunications Services Tel +49-89-92699-227, Fax +49-89-92699-808
pgp80FxdGf4KV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
