On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 21:51 +0100, Matthias Kurz wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote: > > > We should they conflict? In our environment we actually have specific > > need to run both versions. We cannot have both installed however due to > > as far as we can tell only two conflicting files which are a man page > > and logrotate. Personally, it seems to me that it would be better to > > rename the conflicting man page and rename the logrotate to logrotate2 > > thus following the pattern already defined. > > There are conflicting files. And this is why i thought, they should > conflict. Either, this, or someone should fix the conflicts.
Ah, yes. I believe one of our crew here is working on fixing the conflicts of which will be submitted sometime in the future. > > But this is not my real problem. There are some packages, that "Require:" > apache, and therefor it is compiled all the time. Yes, what would be nice is if we could make a Require statement that can include something like "apache||apache2". That would be helpful in numerous cases. > There is no need for action by anyone, because i said this. For me this > is currently more or less a "cosmetical" problem. When there is real > need, i'll speak up again. > > > (mk) > > > On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 08:45 +0100, Matthias Kurz wrote: > > > All said. > > > > > > (mk) > -- David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
