On Thu, May 12, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote: > > > On Wed, May 11, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote: > > > > > 1. Classification of documentation > > > ---------------------------------- > > > We will make a distinction between mandatory and auxilliary > > > documentation. > > > Mandatory documentation is always installed while the installation of > > > auxilliary documentation can be controlled using the package manager > > > application. > > > For RPM there are the options --includedocs and --excludedocs and the > > > > One problem that i see with this is, that the whole package needs to be > > reinstalled, when someone "forgot" the documentation. > > There is also the %package directive. The question is just, whether > > such effords pay back. > > We should avoid %package as it (1) inherently creates ugly redundancies > in the .spec file and (2) totally breaks the "openpkg build", "openpkg > index" and similar tools (which strongly assume that a single .src.rpm > results in a single .<binary>.rpm and not multiple .<binary>.rpms).
Yes, i expected this answer, and it is ok. But we had to speak about it. (mk) -- Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47 >> Im prämotorischen Cortex kann jeder ein Held sein. (bdw) << ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
