2005/5/13, Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, May 13, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > > On Fri, May 13, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > > > > > I made a change in shtool in 2.3.1 boot shell: > > > > > > On PASE, there is no /usr/sbin/lsdev or /usr/sbin/lsattr and arch > > > should be presented > > > as powerpc. > > > > > > *:AIX:* ) > > > cpu_arch=rs6000 > > > > > > # PASE case, no /usr/sbin/lsdev or /usr/sbin/lsattr AIX > > > but CPU is powerpc > > > if [ -d /QOpenSys ]; then > > > cpu_arch=powerpc > > > fi > > > > Ok, comitted to the OSSP CVS for release with GNU shtool 2.0.2. > > For details see http://cvs.ossp.org/chngview?cn=5055 > > Thanks. > > And OpenPKG-CURRENT's "openpkg" package as of today now also contains a > snapshot of this improved GNU shtool version. So, OpenPKG-CURRENT should > now detect your PASE.
Good. Will OpenPKG add patches on its packages packages (both the bootstrap and src.rpm) to make the following assumption : powerpc-ibm-os400 = powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 The problem is that OpenPKG could be easily tweaked but what about the 545 packaged tools ? Ideally if we could have a mecanism (in rpm maybe) to tell that a rpm built on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 in working on powerpc-ibm-os400, we could 'lie' to all packages configure and make them as if they were built on a true AIX 5.2. Do you see what I mean (my english is still very bad) ? ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
