Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > As the packages are named "zope-xxx" I think it better fits that it both > depends on "zope" and its directory structure and also directly installs > into it. There is no real benefit of having them in a separate directory > as they cannot be used without the other Zope pieces anway, right? So I > would say, convert even the zope-xxx to the same model as perl-xxx and > python-xxx.
I have just uploaded a diff for the 'zope-cmf' spec which implements this policy: it deposits the component "products" directly into 'lib/zope/Products'. The diff also extends the set of installed products to include 3 new ones which were introduced in CMF 1.5: CMFActionIcons, CMFSetup, and CMFUid. I will rev the other 'zope-<foo>' specs (for the packages I uploaded last night) to match. Tres. -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
