-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 30 April 2002 08:16 am, Tadashi Jokagi wrote:
Hi, > Doesn't OpenPKG separate the file for development from the present package > composition? . I think that a header file and a library file are > unnecessary at the time of server management. Moreover, why does not use a The potential space savings are marginal compared to dynamic linking anyway. > share library? > Suppose that a security hole like zlib occurred. > In this case, a maintenance becomes complicated. Well, you basically have to update multiple packages after a simple recompile. Regards, - --martin - -- Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold e r f r a k o n Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker Germanenstrasse 15, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8zuvo2QhgvjzqtlMRAmeTAKCvw6RQVsaOmZqFxm5kBeXecFxg4wCfdYO/ lj9d1Qcy6fMogsRmqSCWBnM= =taRp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
