Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2003 10:45 schrieb Thomas Lotterer: Hi Thomas,
> wrong fsl configs. I used postfix-2.0.2-1.2.1 with fsl-1.0.8-1.2.2 for > testing. If you use these or later versions and find a configuration > which crashes please tell me about it. We will retry our tests. > which version, even in a static configuration - see > http://www.ossp.org/pkg/lib/fsl/faq.html#static-fsl Thanks for the hint. > So in the near future you could easily inhibit fsl without having to > hack every spec file. This decision was primarily driven by kolab. This is very good news. > has been completed, fsl will inherit those improvments. It is our hope > that kolab will finally come back on the fsl track in the future. We > need the feedback of the community to improve the code. If it serves our purposes I happily will go back to fsl. (We adopted fsl maybe a little too early and got burned..) Regards, -- martin Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold e r f r a k o n Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
