On Fri, Nov 14, 2003, F. Even wrote: > On 11/14/03 2:02 AM, "Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > lsync is completely separate from RPM. RPM manages everything under > > <prefix> except for <prefix>/local/. For <prefix>/local/ lsync exists. > > It is intended as an alternative solution for easily integrating > > manually installed software into an OpenPKG instance without having to > > roll real RPM packages. For more details on lsync read its manual page > > lsync(8) and the section "Integrating unpackaged software" on it in our > > article http://www.openpkg.org/doc/articles/sysadmin/article.html > > OK....I was misinterpreting here. From what I was reading, I was thinking > this was a way to make already installed apps work with the OpenPKG system, > to create a "virtual" package. I stand corrected. So, if I customize my > "from source" install, and get it to install within the OpenPKG hierarchy, I > could then use lsync to pull it into the OpenPKG structure?
Sorry, when i insist too much - but why don't you just use the postfix package from OpenPKG ? Provided, you're still speaking about postfix. Maybe it is a nice opportunity to speak about the already mentioned openpkg-export package (http://www.mail-archive.com/openpkg-users%40openpkg.org/msg00671.html) ? Hmmm, together with openpkg-export another thing comes into my mind: http://www.mail-archive.com/openpkg-dev%40openpkg.org/msg10994.html (with opkg-r i meaned l_rusr). > Thanks for your assistance, and all your work on OpenPKG. I second this ! (mk) -- Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47 >> Im pr�motorischen Cortex kann jeder ein Held sein. (bdw) << ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
