On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 22:49 +0100, Michael van Elst wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 10:29:21AM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote: > > > Ok, so what you're saying basically concurs with my theory of what is > > going on. The problem though, is that we need to automate the updates, > > it would be entirely too encumbersome to manually update servers > > everytime such a conflict occurs. I'm sure you understand the dilemmas. > > Thus the -D...-D options aren't really optimal for such automation. How > > do you suggest this be resolved? > > For one thing: can you please test wether the update with manually > specified options works ?
This is what I executed, except with proper urls of course... openpkg build -r http://repourl/openpkg/2.1/prod-sparc-sun-solaris2.9 -p sparc64 -f http://repourl/openpkg/2.1/prod-sparc-sun-solaris2.9/index-all.rdf -A -i -Dtcl::with_x11 -Dpostgresql::with_tcl tcl postgresql | bash This didn't work. It still resulted in the same error. Perhaps I'm trying the wrong command? > > For the other: Ralf should add the source change to -current so > that we have more people using the change. If all goes well it > can be pulled up to the release branch. > > -- David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
