As for sendmail improvements. Is there any good reason that programs like 
vacation are being installed suid root in the "files" section of the 
sendmail.spec? At least on our systems that actually breaks the vacation 
functionality and is a potential security vulnerability. I just use cfengine 
to chmod it to 555. Vacation should be running as the user that executes it 
out of the .forward. 

Purgestat, hoststat, mailq, and newaliases also have a definition to make them 
suid root during install, but those are all symbolic links to sendmail. So 
they seem unnecessary. Also since sendmail 8.12 and above sendmail probably 
doesn't even need to be owned by root anymore since it is no longer suid and 
uses the clientqueue to submit messages.

Maybe I am just missing something and there is a good reason for it, but in 
our sendmail environment it isn't.

Thanks,

Mark Keller
Systems Administrator
Portland State University

On Thursday 10 February 2005 1:13, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005, stephane Lentz wrote:
> > [...]
> > => BTW, there are is a  sendmail 8.13.3 patch around that maybe should
> > be taken into account  see :
> > http://www.sendmail.org/8.13.3.html#ERRATA
> > [...]
>
> Now included into the OpenPKG-CURRENT "sendmail" package.
> Thanks for the hint.
>
>                                        Ralf S. Engelschall
>                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                                        www.engelschall.com
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> The OpenPKG Project                                    www.openpkg.org
> User Communication List                      openpkg-users@openpkg.org
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project                                    www.openpkg.org
User Communication List                      openpkg-users@openpkg.org

Reply via email to