2012/1/17 [email protected] <[email protected]>: > Hi all: > > I'm looking at this patch, applied not long ago: > > ORPSoC: Fix Bug 76 - Incorrect unsigned integer less-than compare with > COMP3 option enabled > OR1200 RTL fix and software test added. > > This patch landed in the OpenCores Subversion repository at this location: > > /openrisc/trunk/orpsocv2/rtl/verilog/or1200 > > However, I just realised that there is another copy of the OpenRISC core RTL > at this location: > > /openrisc/trunk/or1200/rtl/verilog > > This copy does not seem to have been patched though. > > I think I've read in this forum that there is a similar issue with the GCC > toolchain, there are at least 2 copies, is that right? > > I am confused about which copies I should be using at the moment. > > Thanks, > R. Diez > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenRISC mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc >
You are right. I reopened bug bug 57 a few days ago (http://bugzilla.opencores.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57) This is not good, especially as we had the two code bases in sync before that. Someone should patch this in the upstream core, and until we only have a single one copy all patches should apply to both from here on. I know that there is an argument for having ORPSoCv2-specific patches, but I'm not really sure there are any real use cases for that. Regarding the tool chain, I would say that the one in SVN is where the most work is being done, but if I have understood things correctly, there are some design decisions that not everyone agree with. Hence the git version on openrisc.net -- Olof Kindgren ______________________________________________ ORSoC Website: www.orsoc.se Email: [email protected] ______________________________________________ FPGA, ASIC, DSP - embedded SoC design _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
