On 05/08/2012 04:32 PM, R. Diez wrote:

By the way, I have got no reaction at all to my last 2 messages to this mailing 
list about similar issues with other instructions, there were titled:

1) Different SPR_EPCR_BASE address on range exception with or1ksim and with 
or1200
2) Different l.sub overflow flag with or1ksim and with or1200

If this message finds no resonance either, I don't think I will post any more 
messages about the test suite results against or1200 in the future.


I'm with Olof on this, I believe it's more lack of time from others than
lack of interest of your good work that is the reason for lack of responses.

Both issues seems serious and will need investigation, thus the lack of
"top of the head" answers.

I at least look forward to more test suite results from you ;)

Stefan
_______________________________________________
OpenRISC mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc

Reply via email to