On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 16:51 +0200, Peter Gavin wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Julius Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I recall you mentioning something about getting the no-delay-slot > > stuff running Linux - is this true? > > No, I don't think so. This toolchain should compile it in delay-slot > mode, however. A nice little macro MAYBE_DELAY(inst, jumpinst) that puts the instructions in the right order depending on arch/compile-flags should do the trick here. Then it's just a matter of replacing jumps and branches in the kernel's asm source with this macro... > > One thing that needs to be done is to remove the busybox binaries from > the linux tree and replace them with a script to build the initramfs > from scratch. I keep these in the tree because it's so much easier than explaining to people how to build an initramfs for their own use. That said, they don't belong there at all and they're not upstream. I just figure that people who know how to build their own initramfs will just ignore the one in the tree... /Jonas _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
