On 21.11.2012 1:49, Julius Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Luís Vitório Cargnini
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello to all,
Why We don't freeze the OR1K tree as it is, with minimal fixes, and focus on
or2k ?
Hi Luis,
If you'd like to work on the OR2K project, you're more than welcome to
get involved, no one is saying the OR1K project is all that can be
worked on.
There's a lot of good work going on in the OR1K project at present,
perhaps more than ever. It's also worth auditing the OR1K spec and
fixing any issues that we can. Lessons learned during OR1K can
certainly be applied to OR2K.
Cheers
Julius
_______________________________________________
Openrisc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencores.org/listinfo/openrisc
Hello everybody.
I'm interested in OR2K progress, too. How finalized is the OR2K
instruction set, are there any plans to finish it in the near future?
Where is the latest instruction set documented?
If the instruction set is close to being agreed upon, I'd like to start
implementing it.
Regards,
Rok
_______________________________________________
OpenRISC mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
