On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Peter Gavin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Another nit:  l.addc probably shouldn't trigger an exception when CY is
> set, even if the CYADDE flag is on.  That instruction is meant to be
> chained with other l.addc instructions, so it doesn't seem useful to raise
> the exception in that case.
>

Or maybe not.  I suppose there might be times you might want to consume a
carry flag, but still want an exception if you carry again.  This is a
tough call, I think.  Any thoughts?

-Pete
_______________________________________________
OpenRISC mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc

Reply via email to