On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Julius Baxter <[email protected]>wrote:
> So, please, go to that wiki page, submit a proposal, we can discuss > it, but it's not going into this round of the architecture spec. There > will be another opportunity, certainly. > I've come to agree with Matthew that they should raise exceptions, but I'm content with your earlier suggestion that they be marked as having an implementation dependent effect so we can get the spec out. I looked through the spec, and I believe that l.m[ft]spr with privileged addresses and l.rfe are the only instructions that could be problematic for virtualization in user mode. -Pete
_______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
