On 09/27/2013 07:20 AM, Stefan Kristiansson wrote: > [...] Full ack on your notes. To summarize I created a drawing: https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1v_T8-NZRBZVo4ecU2Au2HTz1paIsBs_LJyQ8M2lrsf8/edit?usp=sharing
I added comments to the boxes, that explain some "details". As you can see the drawing aligns the modules in a data path. I am strongly in favor on: 1. actually having modules and not implicitly code anything among wiring. 2. also pass the data path through all modules. If features or the situation require bypassing, the module can perfectly do this with the same logical effort as in a plain module situation. I assumed an interface along the data path. I am not sure whether that matches your current implementation, does it? Please feel free to update the drawing with your comments and changes. Bye, Stefan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
