On 06/25/2013 11:50 AM, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hans Feldt [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> - I'm sure you would have had a reason to do it this way, but I thought >> alternatively performing the repair at the AMFND itself(instead of notifying >> to AMFD) is one viable option! >> >> Guess not it interferes with a potential auto adjust feature right? > > I meant that we could avoid the 'extra step' of informing AMFD. > May be, we could reduce the latency (in repairing) if avoid going through > AMFD. > Well, AMFND could be made aware of autoadjust attributes, isn't it! There might be a another higher ranked SU that should be activated instead. A bit like "auto adjust at failures", not the full semantics. A think it will actually work like that. Praveen? Thanks, Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
