Summary:amfnd: failover of PI SU having NPI component[#504]. 
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): amf #504
Peer Reviewer(s): Hans N., Nagendra, Hans F 
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es):Default 
Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
Please see the commit message log and ticket.

changeset 3ca5653771660d5d83b33ce91d81328ccca615ae
Author: [email protected]
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:19:17 +0530

        amfnd: failover of PI SU having NPI component[#504] If SU is PI with no 
NPI
        component or If SU is NPI then SU FSM is always triggered when SU is in
        terminating state and one of the components gets terminated 
successfully.
        But if PI SU has atleast one NPI component, then SU FSM is not triggered
        when NPI component gets successfully terminated. This patch ensures that
        successful termination of NPI component in PI SU should trigger SU FSM.


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/avsv/avnd/avnd_clc.c |  2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Tested the configurations given by reporter and sample amf demo configuration 
updated 
in the ticket.

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
SU failover is performed by AMF.

Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from atleast one reviewer.

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         y          y
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to