Summary: logsv test: Testcases must work with different system configurations
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): [#541]
Peer Reviewer(s): Madhurika Koppula, Hans Feldt
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): <<LIST ALL AFFECTED BRANCH(ES)>>
Development branch: devel (4.4)

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   y
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
 <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>

changeset b9156f00e3de365c0beb3a43abebff32c0997b8f
Author: Lennart Lund <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 02 Sep 2013 16:58:16 +0200

        logtest: Replace hard coded root path with root path fetched from log
        service IMM config object [#541]

         Testcases must work with different system configurations (#541) part 01

changeset afd012be7f673e2d2ec594b97102fbc49a0badde
Author: Lennart Lund <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 02 Sep 2013 16:58:22 +0200

        logtest: New function for validate in test fm when using external tools 
e.g.
        immadm. [#541]

         Testcases must work with different system configurations (#541) part 02

        - Created function aisrc_validate() that will replace test_validate() 
which
        is marked as deprecated.
        - Added function rc_validate() in unit test fw. A variant of existing
        function test_validate().

changeset f0f60862c2f398ab1f34c11c3997727f6e861aa3
Author: Lennart Lund <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 02 Sep 2013 16:58:26 +0200

        logtest: Fix incorrect error print at FAIL [#541]

         Testcases must work with different system configurations (#541) part 03

        - Use rc_validate() when testcase is using an external tool e.g. immadm

changeset 4cb0114ecee843edc7c92e35959d029eaee896d1
Author: Lennart Lund <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 03 Sep 2013 09:45:11 +0200

        logtest: Comment testcases with description of what is tested [#541]

         Testcases must work with different system configurations (#541) part 03

        - Testcases in tet_logOiOps.c (logtest suite 4) are commented


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 tests/logsv/Makefile.am        |   4 +++-
 tests/logsv/logtest.c          |  55 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/logsv/logtest.h          |   3 ++-
 tests/logsv/tet_LogOiOps.c     |  28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 tests/unit_test_fw/inc/utest.h |  17 +++++++++++++++++
 tests/unit_test_fw/src/utest.c |  70 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
For the following tests it is assumed that OpenSAF UML environment is used:
1. Test normal operation. Path in configobject shall be used
# logtest

2. Change root path and test. New root path shall be used
# mkdir repl_opensaf/logtest
# immcfg -a logRootDirectory=/repl_opensaf/logtest 
logConfig=1,safApp=safLogService
# logtest

3. Check new error printout at FAIL
# logtest 4 37


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
1.
114 PASS 0 FAIL. Created files and directories shall be found in 
repl_opensaf/saflog
2.
114 PASS 0 FAIL. Created files and directories shall be found in 
repl_opensaf/logtest
3.
Suite 4: LOG OI tests
saLogStreamOpen_2 FAILED: 12
   37  FAILED   (expected EXIT_SUCCESS, got EXIT_FAILURE (1))   saflogtest, 
writing to strB

=====================================================================================

   Test Result:
      Total:  1
      Passed: 0
      Failed: 1



Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from reviewers


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to