osaf/services/saf/immsv/README             |   14 +++-
 osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.2PBE        |   20 +++--
 osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.NO_DANGLING |  113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


Also updated README.2PBE with a pointer to always at least provide the imm.xml
file at both SCs, when initial start is to be be performed for a 2PBE cluster.

diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README b/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README
--- a/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README
+++ b/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README
@@ -1606,12 +1606,22 @@ Bit 4 controls 2PBE oneSAfe2PBE (see 2PB
 
 2PBE Allow IMM PBE to be configured without shared file system (4.4)
 ===================================================================
-https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/21/
+http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/21/
 
 The 2PBE enhancement allows the IMM to have PBE configred so that it
 does not rely on a shared filesystem, such as DRBD. 
-See: osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.2PBE.
 
+See: osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.2PBE for details.
+
+
+Support for reference integrity checking - SA_IMM_ATTR_NO_DANGLING (4.4)
+========================================================================
+http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/49/
+
+A new attribute definition flag has been defined:
+#define SA_IMM_ATTR_NO_DANGLING   0x0000000004000000
+
+See: osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.NO_DANGLING for details.
 
 ----------------------------------------
 DEPENDENCIES
diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.2PBE 
b/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.2PBE
--- a/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.2PBE
+++ b/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.2PBE
@@ -66,7 +66,16 @@ Cluster-start & IMM loading from PBE-fil
 The active IMMD will order each SC resident IMMND to execute a "preload", 
probing
 the SC local filesystem for the file state that *would* be loaded to the 
cluster
 if that SC IMMND was chosen as coord. The two SC IMMNDs send the preload stats 
to
-the active IMMD. 
+the active IMMD. On each SC, the file probe starts by attempting to open the 
+database file with the 2PBE suffix (e.g. imm.db.2010f at SC1 and imm.db.2020f 
at
+SC2). If the file with suffix does not exist (can not be opened), then a new 
probe
+is tried using the database file without suffix (e.g imm.db at both SC1 and 
SC2). 
+If that probe also fails, then the last alternative is to try to open the 
+IMMSV_LOAD_FILE (e.g. imm.xml). 
+
+When initial starting a 2PBE system, take care so that at least the imm.xml 
file
+exists at both SCs. Otherwise there is a risk that the preloading will hang for
+quite some time, when the IMMND restarts at an SC.
 
 The active IMMD will wait for the IMMNDs at *both* SCs to complete the preload
 task and then determine which SC has the apparently latest file state. The 
IMMND
@@ -135,20 +144,15 @@ has synced (regenerated its file) and re
 
 The 1safe2PBE state is entered by the administrative opeation:
 
-  immadm -o 1 -a safImmService -p opensafImmNostdFlags:SA_UINT32_T:8 \
+  immadm -o 1 -p opensafImmNostdFlags:SA_UINT32_T:8 \
      opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService
 
 It is exited either automatically by a rejoined SC or by an explicit 
administrative
 opertion:
 
-  immadm -o 2 -a safImmService -p opensafImmNostdFlags:SA_UINT32_T:8 \
+  immadm -o 2 -p opensafImmNostdFlags:SA_UINT32_T:8 \
      opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService
 
-Note the explicit setting of admin-owner-name using "-a safImmService". This 
has to
-be used for these admin-operations because the imm service needs 
admin-ownership
-over the object "opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService" in order for 2PBE 
to
-work properly.
-
 Hence the fourth bit in the opensafImmNostdFlags bitvector of the OpenSAF 
service
 object, is used to toggle on/off oneSafe2PBE. Toggling this bit, on older 
systems,
 or systems that do not have 2PBE configured, will have no effect. Toggling 
this bit
diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.NO_DANGLING 
b/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.NO_DANGLING
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.NO_DANGLING
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+Support for reference integrity checking - SA_IMM_ATTR_NO_DANGLING (4.4)
+========================================================================
+http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/49/
+
+A new attribute definition flag has been defined:
+#define SA_IMM_ATTR_NO_DANGLING   0x0000000004000000
+
+This flag can only be set for attribute definitions where the attribute data
+type is SaNameT and the attribute is a CONFIG attribute.
+
+The SaNameT type signifies that the value is a reference to an IMM object,
+i.e. the value is a DN. The IMM spec does not define any general consistency
+constraints for such references. In particular, the value may be a DN for a
+non existing object. 
+
+The new attribute definition flag SA_IMM_ATTR_NO_DANGLING added with this
+enhacement, makes it possible for the imm service to monitor and maintain
+referential integrity. That is, the imm service can releive the OI from the
+burden of having to validate the existence of the object that the reference
+points to.
+
+The IMM service will thus guarantee that the value(s) of an attribute with the
+SA_IMM_ATTR_NO_DANGLING flag, when set, contains the distinguished name(s) of
+an existing IMM object(s). IMM will reject attempts to set it to anything that
+is not the distinguished name of an existing object, and it will reject
+attempts to delete objects that are referenced by such an attribute. This
+validation is performed when the CCB is applied, which means that it will take
+into account all changes performed within the CCB.
+
+The NO_DANGLING flag is not allowed to be set for RUNTIME attributes, 
+(persistent or not). The reason is that runtime attribues and runtime objects
+are not changed using CCBs/transactions and so it is impossible for the IMM
+service to maintain inter-object consistency constraints for references 
+emanating from runtime data.
+
+However, a NO_DANGLING flagged config attribute may refer *to* a PERSISTENT
+runtime object (PRTO). This will prevent such a PRTO from being deleted untill
+all such NO_DANGLING config attribute references to that object have been
+removed. PRTOs are deleted either by the saImmOiRtObjectDelete operation or
+indirectly by a cascading saImmOmCcbObjectDelete as part of a CCB.
+
+The validation of NO_DANGLING constraints is done as part of the apply of
+a CCB. The IMM service does such validation before any completed callbacks are
+sent to any OIs involved in the CCB. If the validation fails, no completed and
+of course no apply callback will be generated towards OIs. Instead an abort
+callback is generated to all OIs.
+
+Association objects (object that have a DN composed of the parent DN and an RDN
+value that is the DN of an associated object) can mark the RDN_ATTRIBUTE as 
also
+being NO_DANGLING. This means that the IMM will maintain the referential
+integrity towards the associated object. Note that implicit referential
+integrity from child to parent in the IMM naming tree has always been 
maintained
+by the IMM.
+
+The IMM will also perform interference checking in the operational phase of
+a CCB. A failed interference check will typically only reject that latest
+operation, without aborting the CCB. Interference checks are mainly for
+regulationg concurrency conflicts between CCBs, but also catch blatant errors
+that are local to the operation. The rejection of such a bad operation is done
+before any OIs receive the operation callback. If an interference check fails
+then no OI will get that operation callback. This is important because there is
+no "undo" callback for indiviudal operations. To undo any operation towards an
+OI can only be done by aborting the entire CCB.
+
+Here is a summary of the interference/operation checks performed in relaion
+to NO_DANGLING. Again note these are performed before the validation done as
+part of ccbApply. 
+
+-          CCB Object Create:
+
+o   If the created object has a NO_DANGLING reference to a non-persistent
+    runtime object, return BAD_OPERATION.
+
+o   If the created object has a NO_DANGLING reference to an object deleted
+    within the same CCB, return BAD_OPERATION.
+
+o   If the created object has a NO_DANGLING reference to an object that is
+    flagged for delete by another CCB, return BUSY.
+
+o   If the created object has a NO_DANGLING reference to an object that is
+    flagged for creation by another CCB, return BUSY.
+
+-          CCB Object Modify (Add or Replace attribute value):
+
+o   If an updated attribute value has a NO_DANGLING reference to a
+    non-persistent runtime object, return BAD_OPERATION.
+
+o   If an updated attribute value has a NO_DANGLING reference to an object that
+    is deleted within the same CCB, return BAD_OPERATION.
+
+o   If an updated attribute value has a NO_DANGLING reference to an object that
+    is flagged for deletion by another CCB, return BUSY.
+
+o   If an updated attribute value has a NO_DANGLING reference to an object that
+    is flagged for creation by another CCB, return BUSY.
+
+-          CCB Object Delete:
+
+o   If an object is flagged for deletion or creation by another CCB with a
+    NO_DANGLING reference to the object that will be deleted, then return BUSY.
+
+o   If an object is flagged for creation by the same CCB, and has a NO_DANGLING
+    reference to the object proposed for delete, then return BAD_OPERATION.
+
+-          Deleting persistent runtime object:
+
+o   Check if there is a NO_DANGLING reference to the PRTO, if there is the
+    delete operation returns BAD_OPERATION.
+
+
+
+
+

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to