Summary: Fix wrong log from amfnd
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 741
Peer Reviewer(s): Praveen
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): All
Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset d7da0bd8a6d91410c074a5cdfcfab14194f59ef6
Author: Hans Feldt <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2014 07:50:04 +0100

        amfnd: guard failed state file removal [#741]

        When SGAutoRepair is enabled and performed the following syslog can be
        observed:

        Jan 24 07:41:57 Vostro osafamfnd[17227]: ER cannot unlink failed state
        file /var/run/opensaf/amf_failed_state: No such file or directory

        The same happens when repairing an SU in INSTANTIATION-FAILED state.

        The reason for this that the failed-state file removal is done in all 
cases.

        The patch protects the failed-state file removal so that it is only 
done in
        the case of the SU being in presence state TERMINATION-FAILED (which is 
the
        only state the file can exist in).


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/su.cc |  6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
 Set default err rec in AMF demo to 3 (comp failover)
 Start single node cluster and load AppConfig-2N.xml
 Unlock both SUs
 kill active demo process

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
 no "cannot unlink failed state" log with patch

Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 Ack from Praveen


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y        ubuntu13.10
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to