Hi, I performed these steps with single controller on 4.3.1 and it worked fine: 1) immcfg -f <2N application> 2) immcfg -f <NoRed application> 3) configure dependency with 2N SI as sponsor and NoRed SI as dependent. 3) unlock-in and unlock of all SUs. 4) immdump /etc/opensaf/imm.xml 5) Restart the controller 6) First sponsor was assigned and then dependent.
Thanks Praveen On 05-Mar-14 9:40 PM, Alex Jones wrote: > Version is 4.3.1. > > 1) Create a 2N service group > 2) Create a "No Redundancy" service group > 3) Have one of the "No Redundancy" SIs depend on the 2N SI > 4) start opensaf > 5) The "No Redundancy" SI will get instantiated, but not get an > assignment. > > Alex > > On 03/05/2014 01:46 AM, praveen malviya wrote: >> Please specify which version of OpenSAF is being used. >> Also please tell the steps performed. >> >> Thanks, >> Praveen >> >> >> >> On 04-Mar-14 5:40 PM, Alex Jones wrote: >>> Hello All, >>> >>> I'm seeing a problem with SaAmfSIDependency when it is used >>> between >>> SIs in different SGs of different types. >>> >>> <object class="SaAmfSIDependency"> >>> <dn>safDepend=safSi=Management-2N\,safApp=ManagementApp,safSi=Management-NoRed2,safApp=ManagementApp</dn> >>> >>> >>> </object> >>> >>> In this declaration "Management-NoRed2" is in a "No Redundancy" >>> service group, and "Management-2N" is in a 2N service group. With this >>> declaration "Management-NoRed2" will never get an assignment. It gets >>> instantiated, but never gets an assignment. >>> >>> If I remove this declaration, "Management-NoRed2" gets its >>> assignment, but obviously the dependency isn't satisfied. >>> >>> If the dependency is between SIs of the same service group >>> type, it >>> works fine. >>> >>> <object class="SaAmfSIDependency"> >>> <dn>safDepend=safSi=Management-2N\,safApp=ManagementApp,safSi=FaultManagement-2N,safApp=FaultManagementApp</dn> >>> >>> >>> </object> >>> >>> In this example, these two SIs are in different SGs, but they are >>> both 2N. This case works as expected, and the dependency is satisfied. >>> >>> Is there a bug here, or am I missing some configuration? >>> Alex >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to >>> Perforce. >>> With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually >>> works. >>> Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN >>> optimization and the >>> freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensaf-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
