Summary: use bool instead of SaBoolT V4
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #713
Peer Reviewer(s): hansf, praveen, nagu
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): default
Development branch: default
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services n
OpenSAF services y
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests n
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
<<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>
changeset 5b6f14ea355661d4db08d2c7a162cbd433c706bf
Author: Hans Nordeback <hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:41:48 +0100
amfnd: use bool instead of SaBoolT V4 [#713]
Since bool is a fundamental datatype in C++ let's use it
changeset e1a10cc36633d7465acb9982abcf5b4c9efb1b9c
Author: Hans Nordeback <hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:48:34 +0100
amfd: use bool instead of SaBoolT V4 [#713]
Since bool is a fundamental datatype in C++ let's use it
Complete diffstat:
------------------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/apptype.cc | 6 +++---
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/clm.cc | 8 ++++----
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/cluster.cc | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/comp.cc | 6 +++---
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/comptype.cc | 6 +++---
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/csi.cc | 14 +++++++-------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/csiattr.cc | 1 -
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/cstype.cc | 6 +++---
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/dmsg.cc | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/amfd.h | 1 -
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/cb.h | 5 +----
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/csi.h | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/node.h | 1 -
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/sg.h | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/util.h | 2 --
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/main.cc | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/node.cc | 8 ++++----
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/role.cc | 52
++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg.cc | 12 ++++++------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_2n_fsm.cc | 20 ++++++++++----------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nored_fsm.cc | 12 ++++++------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_npm_fsm.cc | 12 ++++++------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nway_fsm.cc | 14 +++++++-------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nwayact_fsm.cc | 12 ++++++------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sgproc.cc | 10 +++++-----
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sgtype.cc | 6 +++---
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/si.cc | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/su.cc | 18 +++++++++---------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sutype.cc | 6 +++---
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/svctype.cc | 6 +++---
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/clc.cc | 6 +++---
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/clm.cc | 8 ++++----
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/comp.cc | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/compdb.cc | 14 ++++++--------
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/err.cc | 4 ++--
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/include/avnd_cb.h | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/include/avnd_comp.h | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/susm.cc | 1 -
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/term.cc | 2 +-
40 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
<<LIST THE COMMAND LINE TOOLS/STEPS TO TEST YOUR CHANGES>>
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
<<PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS>>
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
<<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>>
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 y y
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
