Friendly remainder.
/Hans

On 04/22/2014 12:58 PM, Hans Feldt wrote:
> Summary: amfd SU refactoring
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 713
> Peer Reviewer(s): AMF developers
> Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
> Affected branch(es): default
> Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>
>
> --------------------------------
> Impacted area       Impact y/n
> --------------------------------
>   Docs                    n
>   Build system            n
>   RPM/packaging           n
>   Configuration files     n
>   Startup scripts         n
>   SAF services            y
>   OpenSAF services        n
>   Core libraries          n
>   Samples                 n
>   Tests                   n
>   Other                   n
>
>
> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> changeset 89d505f5680924bcf384ff6a4130658751184923
> Author:       Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:53:56 +0200
>
>       amfd: cleanup SU [#713]
>
>       su_act_state is not used thus can be made a dummy (not removed because 
> of
>       EDU usage). The corresponding enum AVD_SU_STATE removed. Checkpointing 
> of
>       su_act_state kept for backwards compatibility but reduced to a minimum.
>
>       The use of "this->" is removed from some setters.
>
>       Some non existing function signatures removed from the header file.
>
> changeset e81dc53b0733dee2b2bbe4d2ec1e3aa6d9dd9ca8
> Author:       Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:53:57 +0200
>
>       amfd: add and use SU method set_pres_state [#713]
>
> changeset 87d7fb15e249c363b2531f43df18d94fa1fa60fe
> Author:       Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:53:57 +0200
>
>       amfd: add and use SU method set_admin_state [#713]
>
> changeset d2c7b29d6113153841ddaaa3ec4ae70784f89ac3
> Author:       Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:53:58 +0200
>
>       amfd: add and use SU methods add_comp/remove_comp [#713]
>
> changeset 4d6d0708b6923a306b9a5ae44be2ddda2cc016a9
> Author:       Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:54:00 +0200
>
>       amfd: add and use SU method no_assignments_of_hastate [#713]
>
>
> Complete diffstat:
> ------------------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_dec.cc       |   28 
> +------------------------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_updt.cc      |    1 -
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/comp.cc           |   11 +++++----
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/su.h      |   53 
> ++++++++++++++------------------------------------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ndproc.cc         |    2 +-
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_2n_fsm.cc      |   14 ++++++------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nored_fsm.cc   |   16 +++++++-------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_npm_fsm.cc     |   16 +++++++-------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nway_fsm.cc    |   22 ++++++++++----------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nwayact_fsm.cc |   16 +++++++-------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sgproc.cc         |    4 +-
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/su.cc             |  140 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------------------------------------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/util.cc           |    1 -
>   13 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 189 deletions(-)
>
>
> Testing Commands:
> -----------------
>   Build and start
>
>
> Testing, Expected Results:
> --------------------------
>   <<PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS>>
>
>
> Conditions of Submission:
> -------------------------
>   <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>>
>
>
> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
> -------------------------------------------
> mips        n          n
> mips64      n          n
> x86         n          n
> x86_64      n          n
> powerpc     n          n
> powerpc64   n          n
>
>
> Reviewer Checklist:
> -------------------
> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
>
>
> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>
> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
>      that need proper data filled in.
>
> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>
> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>
> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>
> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
>
> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>
> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>      (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>
> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
>      Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>
> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
>
> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>      like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>
> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>      cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>
> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>      too much content into a single commit.
>
> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>
> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>      Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
>
> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>      commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>
> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
>      of what has changed between each re-send.
>
> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>      comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
>
> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>
> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>      the threaded patch review.
>
> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
>      for in-service upgradability test.
>
> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
>      do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform
> Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software
> Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready
> Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform
> _______________________________________________
> Opensaf-devel mailing list
> Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to