Summary: v2 amfd SU constr/destr Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 713 Peer Reviewer(s): Nags & Hans Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>> Affected branch(es): default Development branch: default
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- Updated patch separating out logic from destructor into new method "remove_from_model" that has to be explicitly called for an SU that previously has been added to the model. The problem was due to the SU destructor executed in checkpoint context: #6 0x000000000046d15d in AVD_SU::~AVD_SU (this=0x7fbfd191a0, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at su.cc:64 #7 0x00000000004125ff in dec_cs_oper_su (cb=cb@entry=0x6a54c0 <_control_block>, dec=dec@entry=0x7fbfd19938) at ckpt_dec.cc:3340 changeset e16016867b0deb4b66a50dfd2f530f01e23d96ae Author: Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 14:56:22 +0200 V2 (4/7) amfd: add SU constr/destr [#713] Complete diffstat: ------------------ osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/su.h | 22 ++++++++-------------- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/su.cc | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------------ 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- Start 2 node uml cluster, failover controller Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- works Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>> Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 n n powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel