Hi zoran, Reviewed and tested the patch. Ack
/Neel. On Tuesday 13 May 2014 02:00 PM, Zoran Milinkovic wrote: > Summary: imm: fix memory leak in IMM library when search handle is closed > [#907] > Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 907 > Peer Reviewer(s): Neelakanta > Pull request to: Zoran > Affected branch(es): opensaf-4.4.x, default(4.5) > Development branch: default(4.5) > > -------------------------------- > Impacted area Impact y/n > -------------------------------- > Docs n > Build system n > RPM/packaging n > Configuration files n > Startup scripts n > SAF services y > OpenSAF services n > Core libraries n > Samples n > Tests n > Other n > > > Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): > --------------------------------------------- > > changeset 174e38438e18982b0433476fdac513a83fa5a8d0 > Author: Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com> > Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:20:48 +0200 > > imm: fix memory leak in IMM library when search handle is closed [#907] > > The patch provides the fix for fixing memory leak when search handles > are > closed before saImmOmSearchNext function reach the last object in the > search > result. > > > Complete diffstat: > ------------------ > osaf/libs/agents/saf/imma/imma_db.c | 5 ++++- > osaf/libs/agents/saf/imma/imma_om_api.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > Testing Commands: > ----------------- > > > Testing, Expected Results: > -------------------------- > Initialize a search with more objects in the result. Call saImmOmSearchNext > function once or more times, and saImmOmSearchNext should not reach the end > of the search result. Then close the search handle either by > saImmOmSearchFinalize or by saImmOmfinalize. Check that there is no more a > memory leak in the library. > The check can be done by valgrind. > > > Conditions of Submission: > ------------------------- > Ack from Neelakanta > > > Arch Built Started Linux distro > ------------------------------------------- > mips n n > mips64 n n > x86 n n > x86_64 n n > powerpc n n > powerpc64 n n > > > Reviewer Checklist: > ------------------- > [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] > > > Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): > > ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries > that need proper data filled in. > > ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. > > ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header > > ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. > > ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. > > ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. > > ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files > (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) > > ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. > Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. > > ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. > > ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes > like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. > > ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other > cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. > > ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is > too much content into a single commit. > > ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) > > ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; > Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. > > ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded > commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. > > ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication > of what has changed between each re-send. > > ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the > comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. > > ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) > > ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the > the threaded patch review. > > ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results > for in-service upgradability test. > > ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series > do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
