Summary: Start of SG refactoring
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 713
Peer Reviewer(s): AMF developers
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): default
Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
This a starting point of changing struct SG to an abstract class which is 
specialized into redundancy model specific classes. The intention with this
is to simlify logic in the current fsm code where today most of the comlexity
is. This fist patches will be followed by other to remove all functions
pointers changing them to methods and then cleanup of the fsm code.

changeset 3aa4160316dbf43bb6dd5b482aef01f7e4bc3ada
Author: Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:45:19 +0200

        amfd: change struct AVD_SG to class [#713]

changeset b266503c1cc7c962e7218b49c6b2e6d42623f031
Author: Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:13:44 +0200

        amfd: add specialized red model specific SG classes [#713]

        A first step in converting the C based SG FSM files into C++. The idea 
with
        that is to simplify the FSM code.

changeset 5f3e691863bc0847ba7c0d4f1d12a51c9ddb79e3
Author: Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:15:36 +0200

        amfd: change SG node_fail function ptr to method [#713]

changeset 1671840b95d46ea512083ab8d2ca2093bd7ca18b
Author: Hans Feldt <hans.fe...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:15:46 +0200

        amfd: change SG realign function ptr to method [#713]


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_dec.cc       |   4 ++--
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/app.h     |   6 +++---
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/csi.h     |   2 +-
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/sg.h      |  96 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/sgtype.h  |   8 ++++----
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/si.h      |   2 +-
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/si_dep.h  |   2 +-
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/su.h      |   7 ++++---
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg.cc             |  36 
+++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_2n_fsm.cc      |  54 
+++++++-----------------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nored_fsm.cc   |  53 
++++++-----------------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_npm_fsm.cc     |  53 
++++++-----------------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nway_fsm.cc    |  47 
++++++-----------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nwayact_fsm.cc |  53 
++++++-----------------------------------------------
 14 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 276 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
 Start uml cluster


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
 Starts


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 Ack from 2 AMF developers


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data.
Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to