Summary: Special precedence config object/env variables for overload limits
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #941
Peer Reviewer(s): [email protected]
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): 4.3, 4.4, 4.5
Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
 <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>

changeset 1580798004ef966fecd98411f8de12c422b28b75
Author: Lennart Lund <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:16:20 +0200

        log: For overload limits use environment variable value if limit in 
config
        object is 0 [#941]

        Write configuration to syslog


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/README        |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.c |  106 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Testdescription below assumes UML environment
a.
Add the following environment variables to the logd.conf file and do ./build_uml
export LOG_STREAM_SYSTEM_HIGH_LIMIT=50000
export LOG_STREAM_SYSTEM_LOW_LIMIT=5000
export LOG_STREAM_APP_HIGH_LIMIT=40000
export LOG_STREAM_APP_LOW_LIMIT=4000

Start the cluster (./opensaf start 2)

b.
Test with one or more of the environment variables commented out

c.
Change the corresponding attributes in the configuration object to a non zero 
value
Can be done in the logsv_classes.xml file.
<attr>
        <name>logStreamSystemHighLimit</name>
        <type>SA_UINT32_T</type>
        <category>SA_CONFIG</category>
        <flag>SA_WRITABLE</flag>
    <default-value>50001</default-value>
</attr>
<attr>
        <name>logStreamSystemLowLimit</name>
        <type>SA_UINT32_T</type>
        <category>SA_CONFIG</category>
        <flag>SA_WRITABLE</flag>
    <default-value>5001</default-value>
</attr>
<attr>
        <name>logStreamAppHighLimit</name>
        <type>SA_UINT32_T</type>
        <category>SA_CONFIG</category>
        <flag>SA_WRITABLE</flag>
    <default-value>50002</default-value>
</attr>
<attr>
        <name>logStreamAppLowLimit</name>
        <type>SA_UINT32_T</type>
        <category>SA_CONFIG</category>
        <flag>SA_WRITABLE</flag>
    <default-value>5002</default-value>
</attr>

d.
Test with one or more of the values set to 0

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
a.
The following shall be logged in the syslog (messages)
...osaflogd[409]: NO Log config sys: hi 50000 lo 5000, app: hi 40000 lo 4000

b.
Same as above but the value for commented out variables shall be 0

c.
The non zero value in the configuration object shall precedence the 
corresponding environment variable.
A warning that the environment variable is not used shall be logged (for each 
variable).
Example:
...WA Log Configuration object 'logConfig=1,safApp=safLogService' exists
...WA Ignoring environment variable LOG_STREAM_SYSTEM_HIGH_LIMIT
.
.
.
...osaflogd[409]: NO Log config sys: hi 50001 lo 5001, app: hi 50002 lo 5002

d.
Value in environment variable shall be used for attributes that has 0 as value


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>>


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to