Hi!

I have started looking at this now. Two comments so far:

1) In NtfFilter::cmpSaNameT(), do you really have to duplicate the 
strings? I think it should be fine to just get pointers to the strings 
using saAisNameBorrow() and then compare the original pointers. The 
function decodeSaNameT() guarantees that the SaNameT will have a 
terminating NUL character, so the original pointers should be safe to 
use at least if they were produced by this function.

2) Shouldn't the ntfsv_filter_header_free() function loop through 
notificationObjects and notifyingObjects and call 
osaf_extended_name_free() on each name in them?

/ Anders Widell

On 07/15/2014 08:16 AM, Minh Hon Chau wrote:
> Summary: NTF: Support DNs longer than 255 bytes [#873] v3
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): [#873]
> Peer Reviewer(s): AndersW, HansF, Praveen, Mathi, Zoran, AndersBj
> Pull request to:
> Affected branch(es): default
> Development branch: default
>
> --------------------------------
> Impacted area       Impact y/n
> --------------------------------
>   Docs                    n
>   Build system            n
>   RPM/packaging           n
>   Configuration files     n
>   Startup scripts         n
>   SAF services            y
>   OpenSAF services        n
>   Core libraries          n
>   Samples                 n
>   Tests                   n
>   Other                   n
>
>
> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
> ---------------------------------------------
> Patch series version 3:
>   - Fix endian issue in common library
>   - Not allow objects having length greater than kMaxDnLength
>     in ntfread, ntfsend.
>   - Add testcase for AdditionalInfo with extended SaNameT
>
>
> changeset 41e6acf50d610229b7dbf1590a5d98d9d2e80dae
> Author:       Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:50:16 +1000
>
>       NTF: Adapt NTF API to support long DNs [#873]
>
> changeset c6092d94fae5c0db5b98e91bc68d0d58dc066c31
> Author:       Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:50:16 +1000
>
>       NTF: Adapt NTF common library to support long DNs [#873] v3
>
>       (1)Fix endian issue in ntfs_sanamet_length, ntfsv_sanamet_alloc,
>       ntfsv_sanamet_steal
>
> changeset d04dcc662b9b498701764557169ce5fb13eb6930
> Author:       Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:50:16 +1000
>
>       NTF: Adapt NTF osaf service to support long DNs [#873]
>
> changeset 019e5387c457294db13b1a2ccbb0eb28f6b9cb62
> Author:       Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:50:16 +1000
>
>       NTF: Adapt NTFIMCND to support long DNs [#873]
>
> changeset 97fd2415132ed2e3d934774d00294e2c81754204
> Author:       Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:50:16 +1000
>
>       NTF: Adapt NTF tools (ntfread, ntfsend, ntfsubscribe) to support long 
> DNs
>       [#873] v2
>
>       (1) Not allow objects specified in command having string greater than
>       kMaxDnLength
>
> changeset 6f31240a26d0c3757a6f13da82cff9d9244f2325
> Author:       Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:50:16 +1000
>
>       NTF: Add ntftest test cases for notification with long dn objects 
> [#873] v2
>
>       (1) Add testcase for AdditionalInfo with extended SaNameT
>
> changeset 44c410176a04b5cd260f8914da117386c740b461
> Author:       Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:50:16 +1000
>
>       Temporary patch to solve compilation dependency
>
>       This patch is not part of #873, it's made to solve the dependency since 
> NTF
>       is using immutil.c and saflog.c. NOTE that it will not be pushed 
> together
>       with #873
>
>
> Added Files:
> ------------
>   tests/ntfsv/tet_longDnObject_notification.c
>
>
> Complete diffstat:
> ------------------
>   osaf/libs/agents/saf/ntfa/Makefile.am               |    1 +
>   osaf/libs/agents/saf/ntfa/ntfa_api.c                |   25 +-
>   osaf/libs/common/ntfsv/Makefile.am                  |    1 +
>   osaf/libs/common/ntfsv/include/ntfsv_mem.h          |    7 +
>   osaf/libs/common/ntfsv/ntfsv_enc_dec.c              |   37 ++-
>   osaf/libs/common/ntfsv/ntfsv_mem.c                  |  151 +++++++++++-
>   osaf/libs/saf/libSaNtf/Makefile.am                  |    1 +
>   osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfimcnd/Makefile.am        |    2 +
>   osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfimcnd/ntfimcn_imm.c      |   91 ++++---
>   osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfimcnd/ntfimcn_notifier.c |   54 ++--
>   osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfs/Makefile.am            |    1 +
>   osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfs/NtfFilter.cc           |   34 +-
>   osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfs/NtfLogger.cc           |    5 +-
>   osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfs/ntfs_evt.c             |    5 +-
>   osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfs/ntfs_main.c            |    5 +
>   osaf/tools/safimm/src/immutil.c                     |   57 ++--
>   osaf/tools/saflog/src/saflog.c                      |   10 +-
>   osaf/tools/safntf/include/ntfclient.h               |    3 +-
>   osaf/tools/safntf/ntfread/Makefile.am               |    6 +-
>   osaf/tools/safntf/ntfread/ntfread.c                 |   23 +-
>   osaf/tools/safntf/ntfsend/Makefile.am               |    6 +-
>   osaf/tools/safntf/ntfsend/ntfsend.c                 |   29 +-
>   osaf/tools/safntf/ntfsubscribe/Makefile.am          |    6 +-
>   osaf/tools/safntf/ntfsubscribe/ntfsubscribe.c       |    4 +
>   osaf/tools/safntf/src/Makefile.am                   |    1 +
>   osaf/tools/safntf/src/ntfclient.c                   |   58 ++--
>   tests/ntfsv/Makefile.am                             |    3 +-
>   tests/ntfsv/tet_longDnObject_notification.c         |  957 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   tests/unit_test_fw/inc/util.h                       |    5 +-
>   tests/unit_test_fw/src/Makefile.am                  |    1 +
>   tests/unit_test_fw/src/util.c                       |   14 +-
>   31 files changed, 1372 insertions(+), 231 deletions(-)
>
>
> Testing Commands:
> -----------------
>   ntftest
>
>
> Testing, Expected Results:
> --------------------------
>   All tests pass (plus testsuite 35)
>
>
> Conditions of Submission:
> -------------------------
>   <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>>
>
>
> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
> -------------------------------------------
> mips        n          n
> mips64      n          n
> x86         n          n
> x86_64      y          n
> powerpc     n          n
> powerpc64   n          n
>
>
> Reviewer Checklist:
> -------------------
> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
>
>
> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>
> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
>      that need proper data filled in.
>
> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>
> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>
> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>
> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
>
> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>
> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>      (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>
> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
>      Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>
> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
>
> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>      like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>
> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>      cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>
> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>      too much content into a single commit.
>
> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>
> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>      Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
>
> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>      commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>
> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
>      of what has changed between each re-send.
>
> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>      comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
>
> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>
> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>      the threaded patch review.
>
> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
>      for in-service upgradability test.
>
> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
>      do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to