Summary: pyosaf: Add Python clm utils and sample application [#1441]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #1441
Peer Reviewer(s): [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected]
Pull request to: [email protected]
Affected branch(es): 4.7.x
Development branch: opensaf-staging

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   y


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
The set of patches add decorated versions of the clm Python bindings and a 
sample application 'clm-tool' that can either show a snapshot of the current 
members or track changes to the cluster.

I have updated the makefiles and opensaf.spec.in. I can't build the RPMs on my 
ubuntu laptop so please verify that the RPMs are built correctly.

changeset c2c9f78c4cb84f16f7fa49b09daaa33344b56680
Author: Johan Mårtensson <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:32:26 +0200

        pyosaf: Update the makefiles with the new files [#1441]

        Add the new files to the makefiles.

changeset 487b41d8968f8936ace9cccd721996baa3494ead
Author: Johan Mårtensson <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:08:10 +0200

        pyosaf: Add the new clm utils library to the make system [#1441]

        Adds the new clm utils library to the make system. Test by:

        mkdir tmp-install-dir ./bootstrap.sh ./configure --enable-python make 
-j 8
        make install DESTDIR=tmp-install-dir ls tmp-install-
        dir/usr/local/lib/python.2.7/dist-packages/pyosaf/utils/clm/__init__.py

changeset 6bcb380ca146ab951d618c22cd1a68d130d6e929
Author: Johan Mårtensson <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:30:43 +0200

        pyosaf: Add --snapshot and --listen arguments to the CLM listener and 
extend
        CLM utils to support this [#1441]

        Extend the clm-listener sample application with --snapshot and --listen
        arguments to show how to get the current members and how to track
        membership. Also extend the clm utils to support this. Verify like this:

        ./clm-listener --snapshot #Lists the current nodes

        ./clm-listener --listen #Blocks and prints any changes to the cluster
        membership list

changeset 74cc59129234256da86a8a5847ce957c397a5da6
Author: Johan Mårtensson <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:37:04 +0200

        pyosaf: Add CLM utils to the rpm spec [#1441]

        Add the CLM utils to the rpm spec.

changeset e1bca27e64f3c568eda4fa6466d54b831d3db376
Author: Johan Mårtensson <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:46:26 +0200

        pyosaf: Removed un-used imports [#1441]

        Remove un-used imports in the CLM tool sample application.


Added Files:
------------
 python/pyosaf/utils/clm/Makefile.am


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 Makefile.common                     |   1 +
 configure.ac                        |   1 +
 opensaf.spec.in                     |   3 +++
 python/pyosaf/utils/Makefile.am     |   6 ++++--
 python/pyosaf/utils/clm/Makefile.am |  23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 python/pyosaf/utils/clm/__init__.py |  43 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 python/samples/clm-listener         |  39 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 python/samples/clm-listener         |  39 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 8 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Test with the clm-tool:
./clm-tool --snapshot 
./clm-tool --listen


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
 <<PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS>>


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>>


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to