Summary: imm: fix returning error strings when ccbObjectApply is called on aborted CCB [#1508] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1508 Peer Reviewer(s): Anders, Neelakanta, Hung Pull request to: Zoran Affected branch(es): default(4.7) Development branch: default(4.7)
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- changeset 6abdbe2b2387c140205a6eb9efca3d1916f7b646 Author: Zoran Milinkovic <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:15:06 +0200 imm: fix returning error strings when ccbObjectApply is called on aborted CCB [#1508] The patch provides the fix for returning error string when ccbObjectApply is called on aborted CCB. The patch also contains missing error strings. Complete diffstat: ------------------ osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.cc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/immnd_evt.c | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- root@SC1:~# immcfg > immcfg -c Test test=1 > (Add SA_NOTIFY to an attribute of class 'Test' to make the ccb abort) > immcfg --ccb-apply root@SC1:~# immcfg > immcfg -c Test test=2 > (Add SA_NOTIFY to an attribute of class 'Test' to make the ccb abort) > immcfg -d test=1 Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- Both test cases should print abort reason and should not repeat abort reason. Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- Ack from Neelakanta, Hung, Anders Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 n n powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
