Summary: AMFD: Remove use of EDU and do direct encode/decode Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #1544 Peer Reviewer(s): Nagu, Praveen, Gary Pull request to: Affected branch(es): default Development branch: default
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>> changeset 8310f20c47e131e41ca1abf6240292f0a4fc31b3 Author: Hans Nordeback <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:35:48 +0100 AMFD: Remove use of EDU and do direct encode of AVD_COMP [#1544] Simplify encode of AVD_COMP changeset 218e64b064204af9608da8e964031157c25d2f5a Author: Hans Nordeback <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:35:51 +0100 AMFD: Remove use of EDU and do direct decode of AVD_COMP [#1544] Simplify decode of AVD_COMP changeset 598d373becbbd597aca808ed962871c995ce24ba Author: Hans Nordeback <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:35:52 +0100 AMFD: Unit test case for encode/decode of AVD_COMP #1544 Complete diffstat: ------------------ osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/chkop.cc | 4 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_dec.cc | 559 +++++++++---------------- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_edu.cc | 53 -- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_enc.cc | 351 +++++---------- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/ckpt.h | 4 + osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/ckpt_edu.h | 3 - osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/ckpt_msg.h | 2 - 7 files changed, 331 insertions(+), 645 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- 1) Run the unit tests by make check 2) Run AmfDemo app in UML Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- 1) Unit test pass with no error. 2) AmfDemo app run without errors. Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>> Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
