Summary: log: switching to use the C++ compiler [#1624]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #1624
Peer Reviewer(s): [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Pull request to: Lennart
Affected branch(es): Default
Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
 <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>

changeset e59bd481b8c26a827ef023ea1abd7e0201bf2c64
Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:24:12 +0700

        log: switching to use the C++ compiler [#1624]

        Fix error messages when using C++ compiler


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/Makefile.am    |   34 +++++++------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs.h          |   18 ++++++-
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_amf.c      |   33 +------------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_cb.h       |    8 +++
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_config.c   |  172 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_config.h   |    2 +-
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_evt.c      |   22 +++++----
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_evt.h      |    9 +++
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_file.c     |   45 +++++++++++--------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_filehdl.c  |   22 +++++---
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_fmt.c      |   26 ++++++-----
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_fmt.h      |    8 +++
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.c      |  339 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_main.c     |  101 
+++++++++----------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv.c    |  123 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv.h    |    2 +-
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv_v1.c |   28 ++++++------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv_v1.h |    6 +-
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv_v2.c |   34 +++++++-------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv_v3.c |   26 +++++-----
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv_v5.c |   26 +++++-----
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mds.c      |   40 +++++++++-------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_stream.c   |   64 ++++++++++++++-------------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_stream.h   |    8 +++
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_util.c     |   36 +++++++++------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_util.h     |    9 +++
 26 files changed, 624 insertions(+), 617 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
 The changes do not change or have any impact on current LOG functionalities.
 To test this, build it then run the LOG test suite logtest.

 NOTE:
 1) The patch has to apply on top of #1527, otherwise the apply gets failed.

 2) There is an error message in an common header file when building with C++ 
compiler.
 Here is the file and error message:
   
 In file included from lgs_config.cc:35:0:
 ../../../../../osaf/libs/core/common/include/osaf_secutil.h:21:0: error: 
"_GNU_SOURCE" redefined [-Werror]
 #define _GNU_SOURCE
    
 I does a workaround by modifying osaf_secutil.h like this (add #ifndef 
checking):
 #ifndef __GNU_SOURCE
 #define _GNU_SOURCE
 #endif

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
 All tests PASS


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 Get ack from peer reviewers


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to