Summary: log: Use pathconf() instead of NAME_MAX [#279]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #279
Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart, Anders, Mathi
Pull request to: Lennart
Affected branch(es): Default
Development branch: Default
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services y
OpenSAF services n
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests n
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
<<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>
changeset 236665dc60d0d56ff355f6dd3fc3d3908b0feedc
Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:47:49 +0700
log: Use pathconf() instead of NAME_MAX [#279]
Also replace static arrays of log file name, path name by C++ string.
Complete diffstat:
------------------
osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/lga_api.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++----
osaf/libs/common/logsv/include/lgsv_defs.h | 13 ----
osaf/libs/common/logsv/include/lgsv_msg.h | 4 +-
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/Makefile.am | 14 ++--
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs.h | 12 ++-
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_config.cc | 84
+++++++++++++++---------------
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_config.h | 7 +-
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_evt.cc | 61 ++++++++++++----------
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_filehdl.cc | 148
+++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_filehdl.h | 35 +++++-------
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.cc | 178
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv.cc | 32 +++++-----
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv_v2.cc | 5 +-
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mds.cc | 60 +++++++++++++++++----
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_stream.cc | 261
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------------------------
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_stream.h | 30 ++++++----
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_util.cc | 312
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------------------------
osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_util.h | 29 ++++++----
18 files changed, 674 insertions(+), 669 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
This patch does not intend to have impacts on current LOG functionalities.
So, to test it, run the whole log test suite.
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
All test cases PASS
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Get ack from reviewers. Hope to receive feedback within one week.
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 n n
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
