Hi Ramesh! Did you get a chance to look at the review requests for ticket [#777] and [#1636] yet?
thanks, Anders Widell On 01/04/2016 10:18 AM, Anders Widell wrote: > Hi Ramesh! > > Have you had time to look at this yet? > > regards, > Anders Widell > > On 12/22/2015 05:03 PM, Anders Widell wrote: >> Summary: base: Add osaf_timerfd_* utility functions [#777] >> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 777 >> Peer Reviewer(s): Ramesh >> Pull request to: >> Affected branch(es): default(5.0) >> Development branch: default >> >> -------------------------------- >> Impacted area Impact y/n >> -------------------------------- >> Docs n >> Build system n >> RPM/packaging n >> Configuration files n >> Startup scripts n >> SAF services n >> OpenSAF services n >> Core libraries y >> Samples n >> Tests n >> Other n >> >> >> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): >> --------------------------------------------- >> >> Note: I plan to contribute a unit test for these functions later. >> >> changeset 14cd662b79b79166632d17a52584d5cdc2776d25 >> Author: Anders Widell <anders.wid...@ericsson.com> >> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:52:51 +0100 >> >> base: Add osaf_timerfd_* utility functions [#777] >> >> Add the utility functions osaf_timerfd_create(), osaf_timerfd_settime(), >> osaf_timerfd_gettime() and osaf_timerfd_close(), which have >> functionality >> corresponding to the Linux functions timerfd_create(), >> timerfd_settime(), >> timerfd_gettime() and close(), respectively. >> >> The main reason for implementing these functions here is that they are >> missing in LSB (Linux Standard Base), which means that the use these >> Linux >> functions are currently prohibited in OpenSAF. As an additional >> benefit, the >> variants implemented here can never fail (they will abort() on failure), >> which means that the user does not have implement code for error >> handling. >> >> >> Complete diffstat: >> ------------------ >> osaf/libs/core/common/Makefile.am | 1 + >> osaf/libs/core/common/include/Makefile.am | 1 + >> osaf/libs/core/common/include/osaf_timerfd.h | 131 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> osaf/libs/core/common/osaf_timerfd.c | 264 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 397 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> >> Testing Commands: >> ----------------- >> OpenSAF should build with an LSB compiler. The osaf_timerfd* functions should >> work in the same way as the corresponding Linux functions (with the >> documented >> restrictions). >> >> Testing, Expected Results: >> -------------------------- >> OpenSAF builds and starts successfully using an LSB compiler. >> >> >> Conditions of Submission: >> ------------------------- >> Ack from Ramesh >> >> >> Arch Built Started Linux distro >> ------------------------------------------- >> mips n n >> mips64 n n >> x86 n n >> x86_64 y y >> powerpc n n >> powerpc64 n n >> >> >> Reviewer Checklist: >> ------------------- >> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] >> >> >> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): >> >> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries >> that need proper data filled in. >> >> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. >> >> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header >> >> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. >> >> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. >> >> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. >> >> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files >> (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) >> >> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. >> Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. >> >> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. >> >> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes >> like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. >> >> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other >> cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. >> >> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is >> too much content into a single commit. >> >> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) >> >> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; >> Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. >> >> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded >> commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. >> >> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication >> of what has changed between each re-send. >> >> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the >> comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. >> >> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) >> >> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the >> the threaded patch review. >> >> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results >> for in-service upgradability test. >> >> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series >> do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensaf-devel mailing list >> Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Opensaf-devel mailing list > Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
