Summary: cpsv: To correct converting section id to string [#1666]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1666
Peer Reviewer(s): [email protected]; [email protected]
Pull request to: [email protected]
Affected branch(es): default
Development branch: default

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset 590eea6af108dd7c4ae425f7d10a0835d210ae61
Author: Nhat Pham <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:01:30 +0700

        ckpt: To add a test case to verify creating section with long id [#1666]

changeset 8ed45f073c46a42a56296e739eeeaa30ead6983f
Author: Nhat Pham <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 01 Feb 2016 09:55:29 +0700

        cpsv: To correct converting section id to string [#1666]


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/libs/common/cpsv/cpsv_evt.c |  14 +++++++++++---
 tests/cpsv/test_cpa.c            |  33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/cpsv/test_cpa_util.c       |   4 ++++
 tests/cpsv/test_cpsv.h           |   1 +
 tests/cpsv/test_cpsv_conf.h      |   2 ++
 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
ckpttest 11 15

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
The test case passes.

Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
-

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to