Hi Gary,
        Yes, you are right. I attach gdb in amf_demo process only.

Thanks
-Nagu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Lee [mailto:gary....@dektech.com.au]
> Sent: 15 February 2016 10:30
> To: Nagendra Kumar
> Cc: minh chau; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Praveen Malviya; opensaf-
> de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for
> cloud resilience [#1620] V2
> 
> Hi Nagu
> 
> Just wanted to confirm that when you attach gdb to a process, the process is
> amf_demo, and not amfnd?
> 
> Thanks
> Gary
> 
> > On 13 Feb 2016, at 1:35 AM, Nagendra Kumar <nagendr...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > TC #27: Same configuration as TC #24:
> > Add a new Csi in running demo appl: Keep gdb in SU1 comp in
> amf_csi_set_callback and add new csi to existing si. Stop controller, and then
> respond from gdb. Start controller. Only Act assignment is given to SU1
> component. Standby csi assignment is not given to SU2 component:
> >
> safCSIComp=safComp=AmfDemo\,safSu=SU1\,safSg=AmfDemo\,safApp=Am
> fDemo1,
> > safCsi=AmfDemo,safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1
> >
> safCSIComp=safComp=AmfDemo\,safSu=SU2\,safSg=AmfDemo\,safApp=Am
> fDemo1,
> > safCsi=AmfDemo,safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1
> >
> safCSIComp=safComp=AmfDemo\,safSu=SU1\,safSg=AmfDemo\,safApp=Am
> fDemo1,
> > safCsi=AmfDemo1,safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1
> >
> > Logs " TC 27" are attached in ticket.
> >
> > TC #28: Same configuration as TC #24:
> > Delete a Csi in running demo appl: Add a new csi and keep gdb in SU1 comp
> in amf_csi_remove_callback and then delete csi. Stop controller, and then
> respond from gdb. Start controller. Amfd crashes:
> >
> > Feb 12 15:52:32 PM_SC-1 osafamfnd[16096]: Started Feb 12 15:52:32
> > PM_SC-1 osafamfnd[16096]: NO Sending node up due to NCSMDS_UP Feb
> 12
> > 15:52:32 PM_SC-1 osafamfd[16086]: NO Received node_up from 2010f:
> > msg_id 1 Feb 12 15:52:32 PM_SC-1 osafamfd[16086]: csi.cc:1470:
> avd_compcsi_recreate: Assertion 'csi' failed.
> > Feb 12 15:52:32 PM_SC-1 osafamfnd[16096]: WA AMF director
> unexpectedly
> > crashed Feb 12 15:52:32 PM_SC-1 osafamfnd[16096]: WA AMF director
> > unexpectedly crashed
> >
> > Logs " TC 28" are attached in ticket.
> >
> > TC #29: Configuration: One controller, and two PLs. 2N SG, SU1 and SU2
> with 3 comp with one csi and SI associated. Si under si deps.
> safSi=B,safApp=Test depends on safSi=A,safApp=Test and
> safSi=C,safApp=Test depends on safSi=B,safApp=Test. SU1(Act) on PL-3 and
> SU2(Standby) on PL-4.
> >
> > Lock SI A and keep gdb in quisced callback and stop controller. Respond
> from gdb and start controller. After controller comes up SU2 has two
> Standby assignment and no active assignments, which looks serious problem.
> >
> > safSISU=safSu=ABC2\,safSg=2N\,safApp=Test,safSi=B,safApp=Test
> >        saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
> >        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> > safSISU=safSu=ABC2\,safSg=2N\,safApp=Test,safSi=C,safApp=Test
> >        saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
> >        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> >
> > At the same time, there are two error message in controller:
> > Feb 12 19:32:01 PM_SC-1 osafamfd[1572]: EM sg_2n_fsm.cc:1439:
> > safSu=ABC2,safSg=2N,safApp=Test (31) Feb 12 19:32:01 PM_SC-1
> > osafamfd[1572]: EM sg_2n_fsm.cc:1439:
> safSu=ABC2,safSg=2N,safApp=Test
> > (31)
> >
> > Logs " TC 29" are attached in ticket.
> >
> > TC #30: Configuration same as TC #29: This case, Lock SI B, which is
> dependent on SI A and is sponsor of SI C.
> > Only assignment of SI B is removed and SI C assignment remains:
> > safSISU=safSu=ABC1\,safSg=2N\,safApp=Test,safSi=C,safApp=Test
> >        saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
> >        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> > safSISU=safSu=ABC2\,safSg=2N\,safApp=Test,safSi=A,safApp=Test
> >        saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
> >        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> > safSISU=safSu=ABC1\,safSg=2N\,safApp=Test,safSi=A,safApp=Test
> >        saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
> >        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> > safSISU=safSu=ABC2\,safSg=2N\,safApp=Test,safSi=C,safApp=Test
> >        saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
> >        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> >
> > Logs " TC 30" are attached in ticket.
> >
> > TC #31: Same configuration as TC #30. Lock SI B, which is dependent on SI
> A and is sponsor of SI C. Assignment of SI B is removed and tolerance timer
> will start running.
> > Reboot the controller. The assignment of SI C should be removed because
> its sponsor is in locked state.
> > Logs " TC 30" are attached in ticket.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Nagu
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Nagendra Kumar
> >> Sent: 11 February 2016 20:06
> >> To: minh chau; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com;
> gary....@dektech.com.au;
> >> Praveen Malviya
> >> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> Subject: Re: [devel] FW: [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add
> >> support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2
> >>
> >> TC #21: Node shutdown and same as TC #17. Logs " TC 21" are attached
> >> in ticket.
> >>
> >> TC #22: Node lock and unlock(2nd time), result same as TC #18. Logs " TC
> 22"
> >> are attached in ticket.
> >>
> >> TC #23: Node Group shutdown operation: Stop controller during
> >> shutdown operation and it will remain in shutdown state even if all
> >> the assignments are removed.
> >>
> >> TC #24: Configuration: Start SC-1 and PL-3 and PL-4, create 2N Red
> >> model
> >> SU1(Act) on PL-3 and SU2(Standby) on PL-4 . Create a node group
> >> having PL-
> >> 3 and PL-4.
> >> Now, lock and lock-in the node group. Reboot the controller. Check
> >> the admin state of node group, it will be 3. Now, do unlock-in of
> >> node group,
> >> SU1 and SU2 are not instantiated(which is wrong). Node group admin
> >> state is
> >> 2 now(locked). Logs " TC 24" are attached in ticket.
> >>
> >> TC #25: Same configuration as TC #24:
> >> Lock the node group and keep gdb in amf_csi_set_callback in SU1's
> >> comp(Act) and amf_csi_remove_callback in SU2's comp(Standby). Reboot
> >> the controller. When SC-1 comes up, respond from gdb from SU1 and SU2
> >> components. The following error comes, that means extra susi remove
> >> is
> >> coming:
> >> Feb 11 19:46:27 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[16881]: ER susi_assign_evh:
> >> 'safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' has no assignments
> >>
> >> Logs " TC 25" are attached in ticket.
> >>
> >> TC #26: Same configuration as TC #24:
> >> Lock the node group and keep gdb in amf_csi_remove_callback in SU1's
> >> comp(Act) and amf_csi_remove_callback in SU2's comp(Standby). Reboot
> >> the controller. When SC-1 comes up, respond from gdb from SU1 and SU2
> >> components. Amfnd on PL-3 and PL-4 crashes:
> >> PL-3:
> >> Feb 11 19:56:41 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[17561]: di.cc:850:
> >> avnd_di_susi_resp_send: Assertion 'si' failed.
> >> Feb 11 19:56:42 PM_PL-3 osafclmna[17552]: AL AMF Node Director is
> >> down, terminate this process
> >> PL-4:
> >> Feb 11 19:56:40 PM_PL-4 osafamfnd[10912]: di.cc:850:
> >> avnd_di_susi_resp_send: Assertion 'si' failed.
> >> Feb 11 19:56:40 PM_PL-4 osafimmnd[10893]: NO Global discard node
> >> received for nodeId:2030f pid:17542 Feb 11 19:56:40 PM_PL-4
> >> osafimmnd[10893]: NO Implementer disconnected 13 <0, 2030f(down)>
> >> (MsgQueueService131855) Feb 11 19:56:40 PM_PL-4 amf_demo[11007]:
> AL
> >> AMF Node Director is down, terminate this process
> >>
> >> Logs " TC 26" are attached in ticket.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Nagu
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Nagendra Kumar
> >>> Sent: 10 February 2016 17:30
> >>> To: minh chau; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com;
> gary....@dektech.com.au;
> >>> Praveen Malviya
> >>> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> Subject: Re: [devel] FW: [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add
> >>> support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2
> >>>
> >>> TC #16.   Same configuration as #12: Run SI shutdown and keep sleep
> >>> of 5 sec before saAmfCSIQuiescingComplete  and stop controller and
> >>> then after sleep, reject saAmfCSIQuiescingComplete with
> >>> SA_AIS_ERR_FAILED_OPERATION. All the assignment from SU1 on PL-3
> and
> >>> SU2 on PL-4 are removed and SI admin state is 2(locked):
> >>> saAmfSIAdminState                                  SA_UINT32_T  2 (0x2)
> >>>
> >>> "Si going into locked state" is different behaviour when controller
> >>> is up and running and run this test case. In case, controller is
> >>> available, SI will be in unlocked state and all the assignments will
> >>> be on SU2 as Act and SU3 as Standby (on PL-4). This need either
> >>> correction
> >> or documentation.
> >>>
> >>> TC #17.           Same configuration as #12: Run SG shutdown and
> >> keep sleep
> >>> of 5 sec before saAmfCSIQuiescingComplete  and stop controller and
> >>> then after sleep, reject saAmfCSIQuiescingComplete with
> >>> SA_AIS_ERR_FAILED_OPERATION. Amfnd crashes[Please note that this
> >>> test case works with controller up]:
> >>> Syslog and bt:
> >>> Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[15508]: NO component with
> >>> QUIESCED/QUIESCING assignment failed Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3
> >>> osafamfnd[15508]: NO recovery action 'comp restart' escalated to
> >>> 'comp failover'
> >>> Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[15508]: NO SU failover probation
> >>> timer started (timeout: 1200000000000 ns) Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3
> >>> osafamfnd[15508]: NO Performing failover of
> >>> 'safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' (SU failover count: 1)
> Feb
> >>> 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[15508]: NO
> >>> 'safComp=AmfDemo,safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>> recovery action escalated from 'componentRestart' to
> >> 'componentFailover'
> >>> Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[15508]: NO
> >>> 'safComp=AmfDemo,safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>> faulted due to 'csiSetcallbackFailed' : Recovery is 'componentFailover'
> >>> Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[15508]: NO
> >>> 'safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' Presence State
> >> INSTANTIATED
> >>> => TERMINATING Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[15508]: NO
> >> Removed
> >>> 'safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' from
> >>> 'safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>> Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3 amf_demo[15721]: saAmfHAStateGet FAILED -
> 7
> >>> Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3 amf_demo[15721]: exiting (caught term
> >>> signal) Feb 10 11:44:29 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[15508]: NO
> >>> avnd_di_oper_send() deferred as AMF director is offline Feb 10
> >>> 11:44:29 PM_PL-3
> >>> osafimmnd[15760]: AL AMF Node Director is down, terminate this
> >>> process
> >>>
> >>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> >>> #0  0x0000000000412b50 in
> >>> avnd_comp_cmplete_all_assignment(avnd_cb_tag*, avnd_comp_tag*)
> ()
> >>> (gdb) bt
> >>> #0  0x0000000000412b50 in
> >>> avnd_comp_cmplete_all_assignment(avnd_cb_tag*, avnd_comp_tag*)
> ()
> >>> #1  0x000000000040a093 in
> >>> avnd_comp_clc_terming_cleansucc_hdler(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >> avnd_comp_tag*)
> >>> ()
> >>> #2  0x000000000040c7d4 in avnd_comp_clc_fsm_run(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_comp_tag*, avnd_comp_clc_pres_fsm_ev) ()
> >>> #3  0x000000000040ce49 in avnd_evt_clc_resp_evh(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_evt_tag*) ()
> >>> #4  0x000000000042133f in avnd_main_process() () at main.cc:667
> >>> #5  0x0000000000405517 in main () at main.cc:186
> >>> (gdb) thread apply all bt
> >>>
> >>> Thread 4 (Thread 0x7fdaf3c05b00 (LWP 15512)):
> >>> #0  0x00007fdaf2b2b415 in __lll_unlock_wake () from
> >>> /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #1  0x00007fdaf2b27ac4 in _L_unlock_553 () from
> >>> /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #2  0x00007fdaf2b279f7 in __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt () from
> >>> /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #3  0x00007fdaf37edac3 in ncs_os_lock () from
> >>> /usr/local/lib/libopensaf_core.so.0
> >>> #4  0x00007fdaf37e084d in ncs_ipc_send () from
> >>> /usr/local/lib/libopensaf_core.so.0
> >>> #5  0x000000000041eea1 in avnd_evt_send(avnd_cb_tag*,
> avnd_evt_tag*)
> >>> ()
> >>> #6  0x000000000040a2cb in
> >>> comp_clc_resp_callback(NCS_OS_PROC_EXECUTE_TIMED_CB_INFO*) ()
> >>> #7  0x00007fdaf37ecdfb in give_exec_mod_cb () from
> >>> /usr/local/lib/libopensaf_core.so.0
> >>> #8  0x00007fdaf37ecfde in ncs_exec_mod_hdlr () from
> >>> /usr/local/lib/libopensaf_core.so.0
> >>> #9  0x00007fdaf2b247b6 in start_thread () from
> >>> /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #10 0x00007fdaf20da9cd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> #11 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >>>
> >>> Thread 3 (Thread 0x7fdaf3c25b00 (LWP 15510)):
> >>> #0  0x00007fdaf20d14f6 in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> #1  0x00007fdaf3817623 in mdtm_process_recv_events () from
> >>> /usr/local/lib/libopensaf_core.so.0
> >>> #2  0x00007fdaf2b247b6 in start_thread () from
> >>> /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #3  0x00007fdaf20da9cd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> #4  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >>>
> >>> Thread 2 (Thread 0x7fdaf3c58b00 (LWP 15509)):
> >>> #0  0x00007fdaf20d14f6 in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> #1  0x00007fdaf37db22f in osaf_ppoll () from
> >>> /usr/local/lib/libopensaf_core.so.0
> >>> #2  0x00007fdaf37e2acf in ncs_tmr_wait () from
> >>> /usr/local/lib/libopensaf_core.so.0
> >>> #3  0x00007fdaf2b247b6 in start_thread () from
> >>> /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #4  0x00007fdaf20da9cd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> #5  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >>>
> >>> Thread 1 (Thread 0x7fdaf3c28720 (LWP 15508)):
> >>> #0  0x0000000000412b50 in
> >>> avnd_comp_cmplete_all_assignment(avnd_cb_tag*, avnd_comp_tag*)
> ()
> >>> #1  0x000000000040a093 in
> >>> avnd_comp_clc_terming_cleansucc_hdler(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >> avnd_comp_tag*)
> >>> ()
> >>> #2  0x000000000040c7d4 in avnd_comp_clc_fsm_run(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_comp_tag*, avnd_comp_clc_pres_fsm_ev) ()
> >>> #3  0x000000000040ce49 in avnd_evt_clc_resp_evh(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_evt_tag*) ()
> >>> #4  0x000000000042133f in avnd_main_process() () at main.cc:667
> >>> #5  0x0000000000405517 in main () at main.cc:186
> >>>
> >>> TC #18.           Same configuration as #12: Run SG lock and keep gdb
> >> in
> >>> amf_csi_remove_callback  and stop controller and then start the
> >>> controller and make is up. Now release Amfnd from gdb so that it can
> >>> respond to csi remove(Please note that controller has reboot and is
> >>> available now). Now, issue SG unlock. Amfnd crashes on PL-3 and PL-4
> >>> at the same location[Please note that this test case works with
> >>> controller
> >> up]:
> >>> Syslog and Bt:
> >>> Feb 10 16:35:51 PM_PL-3 amf_demo[26623]: CSI Remove for all CSIs
> Feb
> >>> 10 16:35:51 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[26545]: NO Removed
> >>> 'safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' from
> >>> 'safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>> Feb 10 16:36:02 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[26545]: NO Assigning
> >>> 'safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' ACTIVE to
> >>> 'safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>> Feb 10 16:36:02 PM_PL-3 amf_demo[26623]: CSI Set - add
> >>> 'safCsi=AmfDemo,safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' HAState Active
> >>> Feb 10 16:36:02 PM_PL-3 amf_demo[26623]:        name: abcdef, value:
> val1
> >>> Feb 10 16:36:02 PM_PL-3 amf_demo[26623]:        name: abcdef, value:
> val2
> >>> Feb 10 16:36:02 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[26545]: NO Assigned
> >>> 'safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' ACTIVE to
> >>> 'safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>> Feb 10 16:36:02 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[26545]: di.cc:850:
> >>> avnd_di_susi_resp_send: Assertion 'si' failed.
> >>> Feb 10 16:36:02 PM_PL-3 osafclmna[26536]: AL AMF Node Director is
> >>> down, terminate this process
> >>>
> >>> Core was generated by `/usr/local/lib/opensaf/osafamfnd --
> >>> tracemask=0xffffffff'.
> >>> Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
> >>> #0  0x00007f022ebd9b55 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> (gdb) bt
> >>> #0  0x00007f022ebd9b55 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> #1  0x00007f022ebdb131 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> #2  0x00007f023038331b in __osafassert_fail () from
> >>> /usr/local/lib/libopensaf_core.so.0
> >>> #3  0x000000000041b399 in avnd_di_susi_resp_send(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_su_tag*, avnd_su_si_rec*) ()
> >>> #4  0x000000000042e9fa in avnd_su_si_oper_done(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_su_tag*, avnd_su_si_rec*) ()
> >>> #5  0x0000000000411622 in
> avnd_comp_csi_assign_done(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_comp_tag*, avnd_comp_csi_rec*) ()
> >>> #6  0x0000000000407397 in avnd_evt_ava_resp_evh(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_evt_tag*) ()
> >>> #7  0x000000000042133f in avnd_main_process() () at main.cc:667
> >>> #8  0x0000000000405517 in main () at main.cc:186
> >>>
> >>> TC #19.           Same configuration as #12: Run Node lock and keep
> >> sleep of
> >>> 5 sec in amf_csi_set_callback and stop controller. Reject quisced
> >>> assignment in amf_csi_set_callback, Amfnd crashes. Syslog and gdb is
> >>> the same as in TC #17.
> >>>
> >>> TC #20.           Same configuration as #12: Issue Node shutdown:
> >> and keep
> >>> sleep of 5 sec in amf_csi_set_callback before sending
> >>> saAmfResponse() and stop controller. Amfnd crashes:
> >>> Syslog:
> >>>
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[29330]: NO component with
> >>> QUIESCED/QUIESCING a                                              
> >>> ssignment failed
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[29330]: NO recovery action 'comp
> >>> restart' esca                                              lated to 'comp 
> >>> failover'
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[29330]: NO SU failover probation
> >> timer
> >>> started                                               (timeout: 
> >>> 1200000000000 ns)
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[29330]: NO Performing failover of
> >>> 'safSu=SU1,s
> afSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>> (SU failover count: 1)
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[29330]: NO
> >>> 'safComp=AmfDemo,safSu=SU1,safSg=Am
> >>> fDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' recovery action escalated from
> >>> 'componentRestart' to 'com                                              
> >>> ponentFailover'
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[29330]: NO
> >>> 'safComp=AmfDemo,safSu=SU1,safSg=Am
> >>> fDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' faulted due to 'csiSetcallbackFailed' :
> >>> Recovery
> >> is
> >>> 'comp                                              onentFailover'
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 osafamfnd[29330]: NO
> >>> 'safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=Amf
> Demo1'
> >>> Presence State INSTANTIATED => TERMINATING Feb 10 17:21:10
> PM_PL-3
> >>> osafamfnd[29330]: NO Removed
> >>> 'safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDe                                              
> >>> mo1' from
> >>> 'safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 amf_demo[29519]: saAmfHAStateGet FAILED -
> 7
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 osafimmnd[29561]: AL AMF Node Director is
> >>> down, terminat                                              e this process
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 amf_demo[29519]: AL AMF Node Director is
> >> down,
> >>> terminate                                               this process
> >>> Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 amf_demo[29519]: exiting (caught term
> >>> signal) Feb 10 17:21:10 PM_PL-3 osafclmna[29321]: AL AMF Node
> >>> Director is
> >> down,
> >>> terminat                                              e this process
> >>>
> >>> Bt:
> >>> Core was generated by `/usr/local/lib/opensaf/osafamfnd --
> >>> tracemask=0xffffffff'.
> >>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> >>> #0  0x00000000004117c9 in
> avnd_comp_csi_assign_done(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_comp_tag*, avnd_comp_csi_rec*) ()
> >>> (gdb) bt
> >>> #0  0x00000000004117c9 in
> avnd_comp_csi_assign_done(avnd_cb_tag*,
> >>> avnd_comp_tag*, avnd_comp_csi_rec*) ()
> >>> #1  0x0000000000406a3b in
> >>> avnd_evt_ava_csi_quiescing_compl_evh(avnd_cb_tag*, avnd_evt_tag*)
> ()
> >>> #2  0x000000000042133f in avnd_main_process() () at main.cc:667
> >>> #3  0x0000000000405517 in main () at main.cc:186
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> -Nagu
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Nagendra Kumar
> >>>> Sent: 09 February 2016 21:39
> >>>> To: minh chau; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com;
> >> gary....@dektech.com.au;
> >>>> Praveen Malviya
> >>>> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>>> Subject: Re: [devel] FW: [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add
> >>> support
> >>>> for cloud resilience [#1620] V2
> >>>>
> >>>> 15. Same configuration as Test Case #12, SI lock. Keep gdb in both
> >>>> the SUs for csi remove and keep timeout as 100 sec. Slock SI and
> >>>> stop
> >> controller.
> >>>> Start controller and allow csi remove to timeout.
> >>>> Two things:
> >>>>  SU2 has Standby assignment(which is wrong), SU1 has not
> >> assignment.
> >>>>  Error at PL-4 : SU-SI record addition failed
> >>>>
> >>>> PM_SC-1:/home/nagu/views/staging # amf-state  siass
> >>>> safSISU=safSu=PL-
> >> 4\,safSg=NoRed\,safApp=OpenSAF,safSi=NoRed3,safApp=OpenSAF
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> >>>> safSISU=safSu=PL-
> >>>> 3\,safSg=NoRed\,safApp=OpenSAF,safSi=NoRed2,safApp=OpenSAF
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> safSISU=safSu=SU2\,safSg=AmfDemo\,safApp=AmfDemo1,safSi=AmfDemo,s
> >>>> afApp=AmfDemo1
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> >>>> safSISU=safSu=SC-
> >>>> 1\,safSg=NoRed\,safApp=OpenSAF,safSi=NoRed1,safApp=OpenSAF
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> >>>> safSISU=safSu=SC-1\,safSg=2N\,safApp=OpenSAF,safSi=SC-
> >>>> 2N,safApp=OpenSAF
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
> >>>>        saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
> >>>>
> >>>> Syslog of PL-4:
> >>>>
> >>>> Feb  9 21:24:50 PM_PL-4 osafamfnd[7998]: NO
> >>>> 'safSu=SU2,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' component restart
> >>>> probation timer started (timeout: 60000000000 ns) Feb  9 21:24:50
> >>>> PM_PL-
> >>> 4
> >>>> osafamfnd[7998]: NO Restarting a component of
> >>>> 'safSu=SU2,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' (comp restart count:
> 1)
> >>> Feb
> >>>> 9 21:24:50 PM_PL-4 osafamfnd[7998]: NO
> >>>> 'safComp=AmfDemo,safSu=SU2,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>>> faulted due to 'csiRemovecallbackTimeout' : Recovery is
> >>> 'componentRestart'
> >>>> Feb  9 21:24:55 PM_PL-4 amf_demo_script: killproc
> >>>> /opt/amf_demo/amf_demo failed Feb  9 21:24:55 PM_PL-4
> >>>> amf_demo[8200]:
> >>>> 'safComp=AmfDemo,safSu=SU2,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>>> started Feb  9 21:24:55 PM_PL-4 osafamfnd[7998]: NO Removed
> >>>> 'safSi=AmfDemo1,safApp=AmfDemo1' from
> >>>> 'safSu=SU2,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>>> Feb  9 21:24:55 PM_PL-4 amf_demo[8200]: HC started with AMF Feb  9
> >>>> 21:24:55 PM_PL-4 amf_demo[8200]: Registered with AMF Feb  9
> >> 21:24:55
> >>>> PM_PL-4 amf_demo[8200]: CSI Set - add
> >>>> 'safCsi=AmfDemo,safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' HAState
> Standby
> >>>> Feb  9 21:24:55 PM_PL-4 amf_demo[8200]:         name: abcdef, value:
> >> val1
> >>>> Feb  9 21:24:55 PM_PL-4 amf_demo[8200]:         name: abcdef, value:
> >> val2
> >>>> Feb  9 21:24:55 PM_PL-4 osafamfnd[7998]: CR SU-SI record addition
> >>>> failed, SU= safSu=SU2,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1 :
> >>>> SI=safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1 Feb  9 21:24:55 PM_PL-4
> >>>> amf_demo[8200]: Health check 1 Feb  9 21:25:50 PM_PL-4
> >>>> osafamfnd[7998]: NO 'safSu=SU2,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
> >>>> Component or SU restart probation timer expired
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> -Nagu
> >>>>
> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -
> >>>> ----------
> >>>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> >>>> Performance APM
> >>> +
> >>>> Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor
> >>>> end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> >>> Troubleshoot
> >>>> faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> >>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Opensaf-devel mailing list
> >>>> Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> --
> >>> --------
> >>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> >>> Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just
> >>> $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective
> >>> actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience.
> Signup Now!
> >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Opensaf-devel mailing list
> >>> Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---------
> >> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> >> Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just
> >> $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective
> >> actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience.
> Signup Now!
> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Opensaf-devel mailing list
> >> Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to