Summary: mds: Support up to 4095 nodes [#1613]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1613
Peer Reviewer(s): Mahesh
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): default(5.0)
Development branch: default

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          y
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset 8bd3b39888face4a1a2f98e5e7f65d6a3a1d9fb8
Author: Anders Widell <anders.wid...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:50:51 +0100

        mds: Support up to 4095 nodes [#1613]

        Support up to 4095 nodes in the flat addressing scheme for TIPC, by 
encoding
        the slot ID in the lower eight bits and the ones' complement of the 
subslot
        ID in bits 8 to 11 in the node identifier of the TIPC address. The 
reason
        for taking the ones' complement of the subslot ID is backwards 
compatibility
        with existing installations, so that this enhancement can be upgraded 
in-
        service.


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/libs/core/mds/include/mds_dt.h |  26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 osaf/libs/core/mds/mds_c_db.c       |  26 ++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------

This patch should be tested together with all the other patches for ticket 1613.
To test, condfigure a system with more than 255 nodes (i.e. with a node that has
a slot_id greater than 255). Note that you don't actually need to have more than
255 nodes; it is sufficient to test a cluster where some node(s) have a slot_id
greater than 255.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------

OpenSAF shall start an run as normal with nodes whose slot_id is greater than
255.


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------

Ack from reviewer.


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to