Hi Mahesh,
Could you please help to push it? I don’t have authority to push. Thanks. Best regards, Nhat Pham From: A V Mahesh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 1:24 PM To: Nhat Pham <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [opensaf:tickets] #1621 cpsv: add support for 'cloud resilience' feature We can commit now . Hi Nhat Pham, We can commit now. -AVM On 4/4/2016 11:36 AM, Nhat Pham wrote: Hi Mahesh, The document was updated as your comments. Please have a look. Best regards, Nhat Pham From: A V Mahesh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 11:33 AM To: Nhat Pham <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [opensaf:tickets] #1621 cpsv: add support for 'cloud resilience' feature Hi Nhat Pham. Please do update the about the limitation of no-collocated case replicas UN-recoverable specific case and to mention that ticket `#1700 cpsv: re-create the checkpoint without any sections in case the all replicas is lost` will address the issue in future. Replica is user data, any loss of user data to be cautioned in PR -AVM On 3/23/2016 7:47 AM, Nhat Pham wrote: Hi Mahesh, Would you have any comment about the document? If so can you please help to push it. Thanks. Best regards, Nhat Pham -----Original Message----- From: Nhat Pham [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 2:30 PM To: 'A V Mahesh' <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [opensaf:tickets] #1621 cpsv: add support for 'cloud resilience' feature Hi Mahesh, The PR was updated. Please have a look at the attachment. Thanks. Best regards, Nhat Pham -----Original Message----- From: A V Mahesh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 11:52 AM To: Nhat Pham <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [opensaf:tickets] #1621 cpsv: add support for 'cloud resilience' feature Ok , then we will also do it. -AVM On 3/14/2016 10:17 AM, Nhat Pham wrote: Hi Anders, I see that Log service will update the PR for 'cloud resilience'. Is it same for the other services? Best regards, Nhat Pham-----Original Message----- From: A V Mahesh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 11:17 AM To: Nhat Pham <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [opensaf:tickets] #1621 cpsv: add support for 'cloud resilience' feature It dependence : Is other services updating PR for 'cloud resilience' feature or just ok with README.HEADLESS ? -AVM On 3/14/2016 9:36 AM, Nhat Pham wrote: Hi Mahesh, Should I create a ticket to update the CPSV PR document for this feature? Best regards, Nhat Pham -----Original Message----- From: A V Mahesh (AVM) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:09 AM To: [opensaf:tickets] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Subject: [opensaf:tickets] #1621 cpsv: add support for 'cloud resilience' feature - **status**: review --> fixed - **Comment**: changeset: 7319:6ddbce46d3e6 tag: tip user: Nhat Pham <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> date: Fri Mar 11 09:07:35 2016 +0530 summary: cpsv: Support preserving and recovering checkpoint replicas during headless state [#1621] --- ** [tickets:#1621] cpsv: add support for 'cloud resilience' feature** **Status:** fixed **Milestone:** 5.0.FC **Created:** Mon Dec 07, 2015 08:03 AM UTC by Pham Hoang Nhat **Last Updated:** Wed Jan 06, 2016 08:44 AM UTC **Owner:** Pham Hoang Nhat This enhance supports to preseve checkpoint replicas in case both SCs down (headless state) and recover replicas in case one of SCs up again. If both SCs goes down, checkpoint replicas on surviving nodes still remain. When a SC is available again, surviving replicas are automatically registered to the SC checkpoint database. Content in surviving replicas are intact and synchronized to new replicas. When no SC is available, client API calls changing checkpoint configuration which requires SC communication, are rejected. Client API calls reading and writing existing checkpoint replicas still work. Limitation: The CKPT service doesn't support recovering checkpoints in following cases: . The checkpoint which is unlinked before headless. . The non-collocated checkpoint has active replica locating on SC. . The non-collocated checkpoint has active replica locating on a PL and this PL restarts during headless. In these cases, the checkpoint replica is destroyed. The fault code SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE is returned when the client accesses the checkpoint. The client must re-open the checkpoint. While in headless condition, accessing checkpoint replicas doesn't working if the node which hosts the active replica goes down. It will back working when a SC available again. --- Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in <https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/1621/> <https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/1621/> To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit <https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/> <https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
