Summary: amfnd: Add missing braces [#1743]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1743
Peer Reviewer(s): Gary, Hans, Nagendra, Praveen
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): opensaf-5.0.x, default(5.1)
Development branch: 

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset 15be58d75006f89095c295ba7384d3c6430fd5d8
Author: Anders Widell <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:48:31 +0200

        amfnd: Add missing braces [#1743]

        Add missing braces to fix the following compilation error discovered 
when
        using GCC 6:

        compdb.cc: In function 'int comp_init(AVND_COMP*, const
        SaImmAttrValuesT_2**)': compdb.cc:1579:2: error: this 'if' clause does 
not
        guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation] if 
(immutil_getAttr(const_cast<S
        aImmAttrNameT>("saAmfCompCSISetCallbackTimeout"), attributes, ^~
        compdb.cc:1582:3: note: ...this statement, but the latter is 
misleadingly
        indented as if it is guarded by the 'if'
        comp->use_comptype_attr->set(CsiSetCallbackTimeout); ^~~~ 
compdb.cc:1584:2:
        error: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Werror 
=misleading-indentation]
        if (immutil_getAttr(const_cast<SaImmAttrNameT>("s
        aAmfCompCSIRmvCallbackTimeout"), attributes, ^~ compdb.cc:1587:3: note:
        ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is
        guarded by the 'if' 
comp->use_comptype_attr->set(CsiRemoveCallbackTimeout);
        ^~~~


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/compdb.cc |  6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Build OpenSAF with GCC 6 and run regression tests.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
OpenSAF should build successfully and regression tests should pass.


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from reviewer(s)


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to