Summary: do not invoke health check command when npi comp is TERMINATING 
[#1759] 
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #1759 
Peer Reviewer(s): AMF devs 
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): ALL 
Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset e9a4b6f1534e9947719fb8f14987089c777ed6ea
Author: [email protected]
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:01:36 +0530

        amfnd: do not invoke health check command when npi comp is TERMINATING
        [#1759]

        In the reported problem Command Based HC was invoked for a NPI 
component in
        termination phase.

        Before terminating/cleaning up a NPI comp, AMFND stops timer for
        periodically invoking command based health check for it. At the time of
        launching TERMINATE/CLEANUP command, if already invoked Health Check 
command
        is in progress then its response may come during the termination phase 
and
        AMFND may start timer for invoking the command again.

        If comp is not found instantiated then do not start health check timer
        again. Exit status of any pending Terminate/cleanup scripts will take 
care
        of comp's fault management.


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/chc.cc |  13 +++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Tested with the configuration given in the ticket description.

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
When HC command response comes, AMFND simply logs and does not start timer 
again.

Apr 14 14:44:58.979410 osafamfnd [10851:main.cc:0627] TR Evt type:49
Apr 14 14:44:58.979419 osafamfnd [10851:clc.cc:0314] >> avnd_evt_clc_resp_evh
Apr 14 14:44:58.979429 osafamfnd [10851:clc.cc:0325] TR 
'safComp=AmfDemo,safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1', command 
type:AVND_COMP_CLC_CMD_TYPE_HC(6)
Apr 14 14:44:58.979437 osafamfnd [10851:chc.cc:0764] >> find_hc_rec: 
'safComp=AmfDemo,safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1'
Apr 14 14:44:58.979445 osafamfnd [10851:chc.cc:0803] T1 
'safComp=AmfDemo,safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1' not instantiated, not 
starting Command based HC timer
Apr 14 14:44:58.979454 osafamfnd [10851:clc.cc:0417] << avnd_evt_clc_resp_evh: 1
Apr 14 14:44:58.979461 osafamfnd [10851:main.cc:0633] TR Evt Type:49 success


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from any reviewer.

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to