Hi Hung, Reviewed the patch, Ack.
/Neel. On 2016/06/24 05:06 PM, Hung Nguyen wrote: > Summary: immtool: Add missing wrappers for IMM APIs [#1891] > Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1891 > Peer Reviewer(s): Zoran, Neel > Pull request to: > Affected branch(es): 4.7, 5.0, 5.1 > Development branch: 5.1 > > -------------------------------- > Impacted area Impact y/n > -------------------------------- > Docs n > Build system n > RPM/packaging n > Configuration files n > Startup scripts n > SAF services n > OpenSAF services y > Core libraries n > Samples n > Tests n > Other n > > > Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): > --------------------------------------------- > > > changeset a8ecabc78312a60089e3020921615057d69624c0 > Author: Hung Nguyen <hung.d.ngu...@dektech.com.au> > Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:34:55 +0700 > > immtool: Add missing wrappers for IMM APIs [#1891] > > Add wrappers for: > > saImmOiInitialize_o3 saImmOiAugmentCcbInitialize > saImmOiObjectImplementerSet > saImmOiObjectImplementerSet_o3 saImmOiObjectImplementerRelease > saImmOiObjectImplementerRelease_o3 saImmOiRtObjectCreate_o3 > saImmOiRtObjectDelete_o3 saImmOiRtObjectUpdate_o3 > > saImmOmInitialize_o2 saImmOmSelectionObjectGet saImmOmAccessorGet_o3 > saImmOmSearchInitialize_o3 saImmOmSearchNext_o3 > saImmOmAdminOwnerClear_o3 > saImmOmAdminOwnerRelease_o3 saImmOmAdminOwnerSet_o3 > saImmOmAdminOperationInvoke_o3 saImmOmAdminOperationInvokeAsync_2 > saImmOmAdminOperationInvokeAsync_o3 saImmOmCcbObjectCreate_o3 > saImmOmCcbObjectDelete_o3 saImmOmCcbObjectModify_o3 > > > Complete diffstat: > ------------------ > osaf/libs/common/immsv/include/immutil.h | 125 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > osaf/tools/safimm/src/immutil.c | 364 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > samples/immsv/immutils/immutil.c | 364 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > samples/immsv/immutils/immutil.h | 125 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 4 files changed, 942 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > > Testing Commands: > ----------------- > > > > Testing, Expected Results: > -------------------------- > > > > Conditions of Submission: > ------------------------- > Ack from reviewers. > > > Arch Built Started Linux distro > ------------------------------------------- > mips n n > mips64 n n > x86 n n > x86_64 n n > powerpc n n > powerpc64 n n > > > Reviewer Checklist: > ------------------- > [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] > > > Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): > > ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries > that need proper data filled in. > > ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. > > ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header > > ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. > > ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. > > ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. > > ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files > (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) > > ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. > Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. > > ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. > > ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes > like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. > > ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other > cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. > > ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is > too much content into a single commit. > > ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) > > ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; > Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. > > ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded > commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. > > ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication > of what has changed between each re-send. > > ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the > comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. > > ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) > > ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the > the threaded patch review. > > ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results > for in-service upgradability test. > > ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series > do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
