Hi Mahesh,

 

Any comments on the PR? 

 

Regards, Vu

 

From: Lennart Lund [mailto:lennart.l...@ericsson.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:50 PM
To: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au>; mahesh.va...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] Review Request for log: update OpenSAF_LOG_PR for long
DN [#1898]

 

Hi Vu

 

Ack with some minor comments. See attached document. To see comments, switch
on "Show Changes" in Edit->Show Changes

 

Thanks

Lennart

 

From: Vu Minh Nguyen [mailto:vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au] 
Sent: den 15 augusti 2016 13:43
To: Lennart Lund <lennart.l...@ericsson.com
<mailto:lennart.l...@ericsson.com> >; mahesh.va...@oracle.com
<mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com> 
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 
Subject: [devel] Review Request for log: update OpenSAF_LOG_PR for long DN
[#1898]

 

Summary: log: improve test cases for log service [#1898]

Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #1898

Peer Reviewer(s): Mahesh, Lennart

Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>

Affected branch(es): default

Development branch: default

 

--------------------------------

Impacted area       Impact y/n

--------------------------------

Docs                    y

Build system            n

RPM/packaging           n

Configuration files     n

Startup scripts         n

SAF services            n

OpenSAF services        n

Core libraries          n

Samples                 n

Tests                   n

Other                   n

 

 

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):

---------------------------------------------

<<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>

 

Conditions of Submission:

-------------------------

Ack from reviewers

 

 

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro

-------------------------------------------

mips        n          n

mips64      n          n

x86         n          n

x86_64      n          n

powerpc     n          n

powerpc64   n          n

 

 

Reviewer Checklist:

-------------------

[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]

 

 

Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

 

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries

    that need proper data filled in.

 

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

 

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

 

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

 

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

 

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

 

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files

    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

 

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.

    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

 

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

 

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes

    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

 

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other

    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

 

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is

    too much content into a single commit.

 

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

 

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;

    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

 

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded

    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

 

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication

    of what has changed between each re-send.

 

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the

    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

 

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

 

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the

    the threaded patch review.

 

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results

    for in-service upgradability test.

 

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series

    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to